Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 20;113(27):7465–7469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604908113

Table 1.

Regression results of the likelihood to have surgery, observational study

Predictor Relative risk 95% CI [lower bound, upper bound]
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Presence of bias statement 2.81*** [2.06, 3.83] 2.07*** [1.47, 2.92] 2.04*** [1.31, 3.15]
Age 0.95*** [0.92, 0.98] 0.97 [0.94, 1.01]
Race: white 1.37 [0.79, 2.40] 1.12 [0.70, 1.79]
Education 0.91 [0.80, 1.04] 0.90 [0.81, 1.00]
Decision aid 0.76 [0.47, 1.22] 0.95 [0.49 1.85]
Clinical stage T3 3.20*** [1.83, 5.59] 2.69** [1.41, 5.14]
Clinical stage T2 1.72** [1.18, 2.53] 1.37 [0.91, 2.04]
Shared decision-making 0.82 [0.49, 1.36] 0.92 [0.58, 1.45]
Surgery preferred treatment choice before diagnosis 1.10 [0.74, 1.63] 1.17 [0.82, 1.68]
Strength of recommendation to have surgery 1.45* [1.08, 1.94]
Strength of recommendation to have radiation 1.21 [0.66, 2.21]
Strength of recommendation to have active surveillance 1.15 [0.91, 1.46]
Radiation oncologist discussed 2.00* [1.10, 3.63]
Constant −1.37*** 2.76* 0.55
Corrected quasi-likelihood under independence model criterion QICC (goodness of fit) 149.11 104.68 96.44

Models are clustered by doctor and have robust SEs.

*

P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.