Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 31;4(3):141–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00124.x

Table 4.

 Relative efficacy of LAIV versus TIV age and strain (studies 3 and 4)

Study Age (n) All strains*
Relative efficacy, % (95% CI) H1N1* H3N2* B*
Attack rate, % Relative efficacy, % (95% CI) Attack rate, % Relative efficacy, % (95% CI) Attack rate, % Relative efficacy, % (95% CI)
LAIV TIV LAIV TIV LAIV TIV
3 6–35 months (952) 31 (−30 to 64) 0 1·1 100 (1–100) 2·6 1·8 −47 (−309 to 44) 1·2 2·7 55 (−30 to 86)
3–6 years (1133) 70 (38–87) 0 0·9 100 (−16 to 100) 0·9 0·7 −33 (−568 to 72) 1·1 4·5 76 (39–92)
4** 6–11 years (1376) 31 (−8 to 57) 0 0·6 100 (−62 to 100) 1·5 1·0 −53 (−373 to 48) 3·8 5·9 36 (−7 to 63)
12–17 years (835) 30 (−43 to 66) 0 0·5 100 (−369 to 100) 1·6 1·5 −3 (−270 to 70) 2·3 3·3 32 (−67 to 73)

LAIV, live attenuated influenza vaccine; TIV, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine.

*Regardless of antigenic match to vaccine.

**Conducted in children with stable, medically treated asthma, a population for whom there is a warning/precaution against the use of LAIV.