Table 1. Impact of ABCB1 1236C > T-2677G > T-3435C > T polymorphisms on anti-proliferative effects of TKIs.
ITK | Cell line | IC50(nM) ± SEM |
---|---|---|
Imatinib | vector | 257 ± 34 |
TTT | 459 ± 95* | |
CTT | 419 ± 70* | |
CGT | 435 ± 84* | |
CGC | 732 ± 95*,§ | |
Nilotinib | vector | 13.7 ± 3.0 |
TTT | 21.2 ± 3.0 | |
CTT | 18.9 ± 2.2 | |
CGT | 19.5 ± 2,4 | |
CGC | 25.0 ± 2.6* | |
Dasatinib | vector | 0.33 ± 0.05 |
TTT | 1.31 ± 0.11*** | |
CTT | 1.06 ± 0.04*** | |
CGT | 1.08 ± 0.05*** | |
CGC | 1.43 ± 0.03***, # | |
Ponatinib | vector | 0.83 ± 0.08 |
TTT | 1.15 ± 0.26 | |
CTT | 1.18 ± 0.25 | |
CGT | 1.41 ± 0.39 | |
CGC | 1.17 ± 0.22 |
Experiments were performed as in Fig. 5. Mean IC50 were calculated from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 when compared to empty vector. §Significantly different (p < 0.05) from all other ABCB1 variants; #significantly different from K562CGT and K562CTT.