Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 5;4:e2154. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2154

Table 2. SIMPER analysis results showing meiofaunal taxa accounting for community dissimilarity between the Hikurangi Margin and Bay of Plenty study regions (cut-off applied at 90% contribution).

Taxon Av.abund Av.abund Av.Diss Diss/SD Contrib% Cum.%
Hikurangi margin Bay of Plenty
Kinorhynchs 6.6 1.5 2.96 1.31 13.25 13.25
Ostracods 2.9 0.9 2.66 1.25 11.89 25.15
Nematodes 663.4 446.5 2.32 1.5 10.39 35.54
Copepods 58.1 21.0 2.25 1.54 10.06 45.6
Tanaidaceans 1.1 0.4 2.18 1.11 9.75 55.36
Nauplii 38.4 16.6 2.18 1.39 9.74 65.1
Tardigrades 0 1.0 1.95 0.95 8.72 73.82
Annelids 14.0 4.4 1.84 1.53 8.25 82.06
Isopods 0.50 0.3 1.34 0.74 6.01 88.08
Amphipods 0.40 0.2 1.19 0.69 5.31 93.38

Note:

[Av.abund, average meiofauna abundance (individual 10 cm−2); Av.Diss, average dissimilarity; Diss/SD, Dissimilarity/Standard Deviation; Contrib%, % contribution to overall dissimilarity; Cum.%, % cumulative dissimilarity]. Higher average abundance are shown in bold.