Table 7. Results of the SIMPER analysis showing meiofauna taxa accounting for community dissimilarity between seep and other habitats for the Hikurangi Margin study region (cut-off applied at 90% contribution).
Taxon | Av.abund | Av.abund | Av.Diss | Diss/SD | Contrib% | Cum.% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seamount | Seep | |||||
Nauplii | 8.6 | 30.3 | 4.04 | 1.19 | 14.73 | 14.7 |
Amphipods | 0.2 | 3.6 | 3.59 | 1.32 | 13.07 | 27.8 |
Copepods | 16.9 | 36.8 | 3.3 | 1.13 | 12.01 | 39.8 |
Tanaidaceans | 0.3 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 1.27 | 11.65 | 51.5 |
Kinorhynchs | 2.4 | 2.6 | 3.06 | 1.15 | 11.15 | 62.6 |
Ostracods | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.74 | 1.13 | 9.98 | 72.6 |
Bivalves | 0 | 1.0 | 2.46 | 1.04 | 8.97 | 81.6 |
Nematodes | 213.4 | 268.2 | 2.36 | 1.39 | 8.6 | 90.2 |
Canyon | Seep | |||||
Nauplii | 19.8 | 30.3 | 3.8 | 1.21 | 14.28 | 14.3 |
Amphipods | 0.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 1.35 | 12.76 | 27.0 |
Kinorhynchs | 4.3 | 2.6 | 3.07 | 1.17 | 11.54 | 38.6 |
Tanaidaceans | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.87 | 1.24 | 10.8 | 49.4 |
Copepods | 30.3 | 36.8 | 2.87 | 1.27 | 10.8 | 60.2 |
Ostracods | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.71 | 1.16 | 10.19 | 70.4 |
Nematodes | 398.5 | 268.2 | 2.69 | 1.31 | 10.1 | 80.5 |
Bivalves | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.32 | 1.06 | 8.74 | 89.2 |
Annelids | 9.1 | 9.3 | 1.66 | 1.11 | 6.25 | 95.5 |
Slope | Seep | |||||
Amphipods | 0.2 | 3.6 | 3.45 | 1.36 | 13.15 | 13.2 |
Nauplii | 22.6 | 30.3 | 3.32 | 1.24 | 12.68 | 25.8 |
Tanaidaceans | 0.5 | 2.5 | 3.01 | 1.28 | 11.47 | 37.3 |
Kinorhynchs | 3.6 | 2.6 | 2.89 | 1.14 | 11.04 | 48.4 |
Copepods | 34.9 | 36.8 | 2.89 | 1.17 | 11.01 | 59.4 |
Ostracods | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.65 | 1.16 | 10.1 | 69.5 |
Nematodes | 315.5 | 268.2 | 2.38 | 1.27 | 9.07 | 78.5 |
Bivalves | 0.03 | 1.0 | 2.28 | 1.04 | 8.7 | 87.2 |
Annelids | 5.3 | 9.3 | 1.83 | 0.83 | 6.99 | 94.2 |
Note:
[Av.abund, average meiofauna abundance (individual 10 cm−2); Av.Diss, average dissimilarity; Diss/SD, Dissimilarity/Standard Deviation; Contrib%, % contribution to overall dissimilarity; Cum.%, % cumulative dissimilarity]. Higher average abundance are shown in bold.