Table 5.
Rowa | gen_prof_ disclose_ screen b |
referral_ barrier c |
gen_directly_ contacts_pt d |
difficulty_ contact_pt e |
# cases fitting configure- ation |
High-PF (outcome) |
Raw consis- tency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1f |
B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1f |
C | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0g |
D | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0g |
E | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0g |
F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0g |
Notes: The revised truth table was created using fsQCA 2.0 software by adding a fourth condition to the original truth table, assigning outcome scores for each configuration, and deleting configurations with no cases (remainders).
Each row represents a configuration of conditions. Although there are 24 (16) possible configurations, only those configurations for which there are cases are shown.
Genetics professional discloses positive screening results (presence=1, absence=0)
Referral is primary mechanism for patient to receive genetic testing (presence=1, absence=0)
Genetic professional contacts patient directly to set up counseling and testing (presence=1, absence=0)
Difficulty contacting patients after a positive tumor screen (presence=1, absence=0)
The consistency scores for rows A-B are 1 because all cases with these configurations have high patient follow-through (High-PF=1).
The consistency scores for rows C-F are 0 because none of the cases in those configurations have high patient follow-through (High-PF=0)