Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 12;11(7):e0159139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159139

Table 1. Characteristics of participants and univariate logistic regression analysis showing predictors of willingness to participate (WTP) in a dengue study (good vs. poor) (n = 535).

Variable n (%) WTP score WTP (Good/Poor) Univariate logistic regression
OR (95% CI) P–value
Regency 0.734
 Aceh Tengah (R) 65 (12.1) 7.12±2.06 12/53 1
 Langsa 74 (13.8) 7.42±1.90 14/60 1.03 (0.44–2.42) 0.945
 Aceh Besar 88 (16.4) 6.93±2.36 20/68 1.30 (0.58–2.89) 0.522
 Aceh Utara 43 (8.0) 7.05±2.31 10/33 1.34 (0.52–3.44) 0.546
 Aceh Singkil 49 (9.2) 7.12±2.02 9/40 0.99 (0.38–2.59) 0.990
 Sabang 56 (10.5) 7.23±1.66 6/50 0.53 (0.18–1.52) 0.238
 Aceh Timur 33 (6.2) 7.15±2.11 7/26 1.19 (0.42–3.38) 0.745
 Aceh Selatan 67 (12.5) 6.36±2.40 10/57 0.77 (0.31–1.94) 0.586
 Aceh Tamiang 60 (11.2) 7.43±1.95 14/46 1.34 (0.56–3.20) 0.503
Age group 0.273
 17–29 (R) 289 (54.0) 6.97±2.26 63/226 1
 30–44 179 (33.5) 7.24±1.94 31/148 0.75 (0.47–1.21) 0.241
 45–59 60 (11.2) 7.08±1.93 7/53 0.47 (0.20–1.09) 0.080
 60–84 7 (1.3) 7.42±1.90 1/6 0.60 (0.07–5.06) 0.637
Sex 0.023*
 Male (R) 166 (31.0) 6.97±2.07 22/144 1
 Female 369 (69.0) 7.13±2.14 80/289 1.81 (1.08–3.02)
Education 0.109
 Primary (R) 34 (6.4) 6.85±1.79 3/31 1
 Junior high school 31 (5.8) 6.39±2.14 1/30 0.34 (0.03–3.50) 0.368
 Senior high school 207 (38.7) 6.93±2.18 39/168 2.40 (0.70–8.25) 0.165
 Diploma 114 (21.3) 7.34±2.03 26/88 3.05 (0.86–10.80) 0.083
 University graduate 149 (27.9) 7.28±2.13 33/116 2.94 (0.84–10.22) 0.090
Occupation 0.079
 Farmer (R) 139 (26.0) 7.11±1.61 26/113 1
 Civil servant 83 (15.5) 7.29±1.97 20/63 2.84 (1.11–7.23) 0.029*
 Private employee 100 (18.7) 7.01±2.38 21/79 3.91 (1.48–10.35) 0.006*
 Entrepreneur 80 (15.0) 7.07±2.14 6/74 3.28 (1.25–8.57) 0.015*
 Student/university student 133 (24.9) 6.88±2.33 29/104 3.44 (1.36–8.70) 0.009*
Religion 0.999
 Muslim (R) 528 (98.7) 7.07±2.13 102/426 1
 Other 7 (1.3) 7.43±0.97 0/7 0.00 (0.00-NA)
Marital status 0.204
 Unmarried (R) 228 (42.6) 6.98±2.28 51/177 1
 Married 289 (54.0) 7.10±2.02 47/242 0.67 (0.43–1.05) 0.080
 Widowed 18 (3.4) 8.0±1.08 4/14 0.99 (0.31–3.14) 0.989
Monthly income 0.137
 <1 million (R) 270 (50.5) 7.02±2.16 56/214 1
 1—≤ 2 million 108 (20.2) 6.77±2.13 15/93 0.61 (0.33–1.14) 0.126
 2—≤ 3 million 88 (16.4) 7.10±2.02 13/75 0.66 (0.34–1.28) 0.220
 > 3 million 69 (12.9) 7.74±1.94 18/51 1.35 (0.73–2.49) 0.338
Type of residence 0.598
 Suburb (R) 177 (33.1) 7.16±2.14 36/141 1
 City 358 (66.9) 7.04±2.11 66/292 1.13 (0.72–1.78)
Have family member(s) suffered from dengue? 0.213
 No (R) 117 (21.9) 7.12±2.30 27/90 1
 Yes 418 (78.1) 7.07±2.07 75/343 1.37 (0.83–2.26)
Have you personally suffered from dengue? 0.275
 No (R) 48 (9.0) 7.44±2.10 12/36 1
 Yes 487 (91.0) 7.04±2.12 90/397 1.47 (0.74–2.94)
Socioeconomic level 0.293
 Poorest quintile (R) 107 (20) 6.86±1.99 14/93 1
 2nd 107 (20) 6.90±2.18 22/85 1.71 (0.82–3.57) 0.147
 3rd 107 (20) 6.91±2.15 18/89 1.34 (0.63–2.86) 0.444
 4th 107 (20) 7.25±2.15 22/85 1.71 (0.82–3.57) 0.147
 Richest quintile 107 (20) 7.48±2.07 26/81 2.71 (1.04–4.35) 0.038*
Knowledge regarding dengue fever <0.001**
 Poor (R) 341 (63.7) 6.82±2.07 41/300 1
 Good 194 (36.3) 7.54±2.12 61/133 3.36 (2.15–5.24)
Attitude towards dengue fever <0.001**
 Poor (R) 381 (71.2) 6.68±2.06 39/342 1
 Good 154 (28.8) 8.06±1.94 63/91 6.07 (3.83–9.63)
Preventive practice against dengue fever 0.018*
 Poor (R) 377 (70.5) 6.96±2.11 62/315 1
 Good 158 (29.5) 7.37±2.11 40/118 1.72 (1.10–2.70)

CI: confidence interval, OR: odds ratio, R: reference group

* Significant at 0.05

**Significant at 0.01