Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 30;36(3):309–318. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.3.309

Table 2. Effects of proximate composition of reduced-fat frankfurters formulations with varying amounts of added fat with and without pumpkin fiber.

Parameters ControlA T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Moisture (%) 53.57±0.47g 56.30±0.89f 58.15±0.31e 62.15±0.38d 64.02±0.53c 66.88±0.53b 68.55±0.85a
Protein (%) 12.98±0.46 13.56±0.50 13.26±0.44 13.45±0.26 13.13±0.71 13.38±0.44 13.05±0.60
Fat (%) 030.21±0.63a 26.19±0.69b 25.77±1.29b 20.13±0.97c 19.93±1.14c 14.61±0.51d 13.93±0.51d
Ash (%) 2.28±0.05c 2.30±0.04c 2.44±0.05b 2.32±0.07c 2.51±0.06ab 2.46±0.09b 2.55±0.08a
Energy value (kcal/100g) 336.61±6.14a 301.64±5.23bc 296.15±4.23c 251.76±4.38d 243.45±4.87e 205.13±4.01f 195.13±5.21g

All values are mean±standard deviation of three replicates.

a-gMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

AControl, frankfurter with 30% fat without pumpkin fiber; T1, frankfurter with 25% fat without pumpkin fiber; T2, frankfurter with 25% fat with 2% pumpkin fiber; T3, frankfurter with 20% fat without pumpkin fiber; T4, frankfurter with 20% fat with 2% pumpkin fiber; T5, frankfurter with 15% fat without pumpkin fiber; T6, frankfurter with 15% fat with 2% pumpkin fiber.