Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Dent. 2015 Dec;28(6):321–332.

Table 6.

Dentin permeability of specimens after bonding with self-etching adhesives, compared to acid-etched controls.

Adhesives Reductions in permeability after bonding
Xeno IIIf −68.9 ± 15.7%a
AdhSEe −58.2 ± 26.8%a,b
Adper Prompt L-Popa −51.0 ± 33.2%a,b
Etch & Prime 3.0m −56.8 ± 26.3%a,b
One-Up Bondk −60.5 ± 27.3%a,b
Optibond Solo Plus SEb −45.6 ± 34.4%a,b
Prime & Bond NT controlf −42.3 ± 5.1%b
Clearfil SE Bondc −35.5 ± 14.7%b,c
Prime & Bond NRC NTf −16.4 ± 33.3%c
Prompt L-Popa −16.3 ± 13.3%c

Values are mean ± SE, N=10. Groups identified by different superscript letters are significantly different (p<0.05). Smear layer was created using 4000 grit SiC paper. Only 1 layer of adhesive was used with Prompt L-Pop, while multiple layers were used with Adper Prompt L-Pop. Prime & Bond NRC NT is a no rinse conditioner that does not require water rinsing, used with Prime & Bond NT adhesive (from Gregorié et al.43, with permission).