Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2013 Aug 29;253:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.08.035

Table 1.

Baseline thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in wild-type (WT), prolactin null-mutant (PRL KO) and prolactin receptor null-mutant (PRLR KO) female and male mice.

WT vs PRL KO WT vs PRLR KO
Heat Cold Mechanical Heat Cold Mechanical
Female 9.12±0.45 vs 8.21±0.24 (ns) 4.11±0.30 vs 8.08±0.65(**) 7.92±0.43 vs 7.41±0.54 (ns) 8.42±0.37 vs 7.54±0.28 (ns) 3.63±0.35 vs 6.88±0.26 (***) 7.71±0.49 vs 7.16±0.61 (ns)
Male 10.08±0.46 vs 9.45±0.52 (ns) 7.28±0.59 vs 8.46±0.57 (ns) 8.35±0.42 vs 8.01±0.37 (ns) 9.22±0.43 vs 8.46±0.38 (ns) 6.68±0.53 vs 7.39±0.72 (ns) 8.02±0.33 vs 7.73±0.66 (ns)

N=8-10. Significant changes (unpaired t-test) are in brackets: ns – non-significant

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001.

Heat nociception is measured as paw withdrawal latency (PWL) in seconds.

Cold nociception is measured in threshold temperature in degrees (°C).

Mechanical nociception is measured in threshold force in grams (g).