Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 23;31(4):478–483. doi: 10.1002/mds.26492

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Directed acyclic graph (DAG) demonstrating the concept and assumptions of Mendelian randomization (with an example in parentheses), including the relationship of the instrumental variable with the exposure (assumption 1) and independence from confounding factors (assumption 2) and the outcome (assumption 3). Note that the only way that the instrumental variable influences the outcome is via the exposure (behavior or phenotype). In the example given, the FTO gene variant (instrumental variable) influences BMI (exposure/intermediate phenotype), which is causally associated with heart disease (outcome). [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]