Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 18;5(3):e002377. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002377

Table 3.

Association Between CCA IMT Progression and CMB Presence, Stratified by Hypertension Treatment

Exposure Outcome Model No Hypertension Treatment (n=963) Hypertension Treatment (n=261) P Value for Interaction
Participants With CMBs OR (95% CI) P Value Participants With CMBs OR (95% CI) P Value
Change in CCA IMT (per SD increment) Any CMB 1 63 0.78 (0.53–1.15) 0.22 36 0.89 (0.62–1.29) 0.55 0.68
2 63 0.78 (0.53–1.14) 0.20 36 0.84 (0.57–1.23) 0.36 0.69
3 63 0.78 (0.53–1.16) 0.22 36 0.83 (0.57–1.22) 0.35 0.68
Lobar only 1 42 0.93 (0.62–1.39) 0.72 23 1.04 (0.81–1.32) 0.78 0.68
2 42 0.95 (0.63–1.43) 0.81 23 0.98 (0.75–1.28) 0.90 0.60
3 42 0.97 (0.64–1.48) 0.90 23 1.00 (0.76–1.30) 0.97 0.60
Deep plus mixed 1 21 0.54 (0.27–1.09) 0.08 13 0.38 (0.17–0.87) 0.02 0.53
2 21 0.51 (0.25–1.05) 0.07 13 0.41 (0.18–0.94) 0.03 0.57
3 21 0.51 (0.24–1.05) 0.07 13 0.41 (0.18–0.96) 0.04 0.57

Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and years between exam 8 and MRI. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for diabetes, smoking, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, prevalent cardiovascular disease, and statin use. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for baseline carotid IMT. CCA indicates common carotid artery; CMB, cerebral microbleed; IMT, intima media thickness; OR, odds ratio.

A 1‐SD increment is 0.010 for CCA IMT.