Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;5(3):e002882. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002882

Table 2.

Distribution of Occurrence of New ECG Abnormalities During EDIC Follow‐up by Baseline Characteristics

Baseline Characteristics New Major ECG Abnormality, N (%) Any New ECG Abnormality, N (%)
All (n=1314) 172 (13.1) 1016 (77.3)
Age group, yr
<40 (n=931) 103 (11.1) 701 (75.3)
≥40 (n=383) 69 (18.0)a 315 (82.3)a
Gender
Female (n=624) 78 (12.5) 481 (77.1)
Male (n=690) 94 (13.6) 535 (77.5)
Study cohortb
Primary (n=653) 93 (14.2) 506 (77.5)
Secondary (n=661) 79 (12.0) 510 (77.2)
DCCT treatment groupc
Intensive (n=656) 83 (12.7) 499 (76.1)
Conventional (n=658) 89 (13.5) 517 (78.6)
HbA1c
<8.0% (n=670) 70 (10.5) 505 (75.4)
≥8.0% (n=644) 102 (15.8)a 511 (79.4)

DCCT indicates Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; EDIC, Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.

a

Significant differences; P<0.05.

b

Primary prevention cohort includes DCCT participants with diabetes duration 1 to 5 years, no retinopathy, and urinary albumin excretion rate <40 mg/day. Secondary intervention cohort includes DCCT participants 1 to 15 years duration, very mild‐to‐moderate nonproliferative retinopathy, and albumin excretion rate <200 mg/day.

c

Intensive therapy aimed to achieve levels of glycemia as close to the nondiabetic range as safely possible, whereas conventional therapy aimed to maintain clinical well‐being with no specific glucose targets.