Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):196–201. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3683

Table 2. Comparison of heart rate variability parameters between autoregressive and fast Fourier transform methods.

HRV parameters AR FFT Effect size p value
Total power (ms2) 3,992±3,138 3,902±3,188 0.03 <0.001
LF (ms2) 1,268±1,024 1,165±1,014 0.10 0.001
HF (ms2) 1,377±1,424 1,352±1,429 0.02 <0.001
LF (n.u.) 52.9±15.6 51.4±16.8 0.09 <0.001
HF (n.u.) 47.1±15.6 48.6±16.8 0.09 <0.001
LF/HF ratio 1.41±1.18 1.44±1.08 0.02 0.039

HRV: heart rate variability; AR: autoregressive; FFT: fast Fourier transform; LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; n.u: normalized units.