Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;3(2):ofw098. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw098

Table 4.

Associations Between Body Fat Depots and Presence of Coronary Plaque (Score >0) and Coronary Artery Stenosis >50%

Plaque Type, Analytic Model Visceral Adipose Tissue
Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue
Thigh Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (tSAT)
All (N = 937) HIV+ (N = 596) HIV− (N = 341) All (N = 937) HIV+ (N = 596) HIV− (N = 341) All (N = 938) HIV+ (N = 596) HIV− (N = 342)
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
CAC
 Model 1 1.00 (.98–1.02) 1.00 (.98–1.02) 0.99 (.96–1.02) 1.00 (.99–1.01) 0.99 (.98–1.01) 1.00 (.98–1.03) 1.00 (.95–1.06) 0.99 (.92–1.06) 1.03 (.94–1.12)
 Model 2 0.99 (.97–1.02) 1.00 (.98–1.03) 0.97 (.92–1.01) 0.99 (.96–1.01) 0.99 (.96–1.01) 0.99 (.95–1.02) 0.99 (.93–1.06) 0.99 (.90–1.08) 1.00 (.88–1.13)
Noncalcified Plaque (NCP)a,b
 Model 1 1.02c (1.00–1.04) 1.04* (1.01–1.07) 0.99 (.96–1.03) 1.00 (.99–1.01) 1.00 (.99–1.02) 0.99 (.97–1.02) 1.01 (.95–1.07) 1.04 (.96–1.12) 0.99 (.91–1.07)
 Model 2 1.02d (.99–1.05) 1.04* (1.00–1.08) 0.99 (.95–1.03) 0.98 (.96–1.00) 0.98 (.95–1.01) 0.98 (.95–1.02) 0.98 (.91–1.05) 1.00 (.90–1.11) 0.96 (.85–1.09)
Calcified Plaque (CP)a,b
 Model 1 1.04 (.98–1.02) 1.01 (.98–1.04) 0.99 (.95–1.02) 1.00 (.99–1.02) 1.00 (.99–1.02) 0.99 (.97–1.02) 1.02 (.96–1.08) 1.04 (.96–1.13) 0.96 (.87–1.06)
 Model 2 0.99 (.97–1.02) 1.00 (.97–1.04) 0.98 (.94–1.03) 0.99 (.97–1.02) 0.99 (.96–1.02) 0.98 (.94–1.03) 1.00 (.92–1.09) 1.02 (.92–1.14) 0.93 (.80–1.08)
Mixed Plaque (MP)a,b
 Model 1 1.00 (.98–1.02) 1.00 (.98–1.03) 0.99 (.96–1.03) 0.99 (.98–1.00) 0.99 (.97–1.01) 0.99 (.97–1.02) 0.98 (.92–1.04) 0.98 (.90–1.06) 0.98 (.89–1.08)
 Model 2 1.01 (.98–1.04) 1.01 (.98–1.05) 1.00 (.96–1.05) 0.99 (.96–1.01) 0.98 (.95–1.01) 1.01 (.97–1.05) 1.00 (.92–1.08) 0.99 (.89–1.10) 1.04 (.89–1.20)
Total Plaque Scorea,b
 Model 1 1.02 (.99–1.05) 1.04* (1.00–1.08) 0.99 (.95–1.04) 1.01 (.99–1.02) 1.01 (.99–1.03) 1.00 (.98–1.03) 1.05 (.98–1.12) 1.05 (.96–1.16) 1.03 (.92–1.14)
 Model 2 1.02 (.98–1.05) 1.04 (.995–1.09) 0.98 (.93–1.04) 0.99 (.97–1.02) 0.99 (.96–1.02) 1.00 (.96–1.04) 1.04 (.95–1.14) 1.03 (.91–1.16) 1.04 (.89–1.22)
Stenosis >50%a,b
 Model 1 0.99 (.97–1.02) 0.98 (.94–1.01) 1.02 (.97–1.07) 0.99 (.97–1.01) 0.98 (.96–1.01) 1.01 (.97–1.04) 1.00 (.93–1.09) 1.00 (.89–1.11) 1.01 (.89–1.15)
 Model 2 0.99 (.96–1.03) 0.98 (.94–1.02) 1.01 (.95–1.07) 0.98 (.95–1.01) 0.98 (.94–1.02) 0.99 (.93–1.04) 1.01 (.91–1.12) 1.04 (.91–1.19) 0.92 (.76–1.13)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAC, coronary artery calcium score; CI, confidence interval; CP, calcified plaque score; CTA, computed tomography angiography; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MP, mixed plaque score; NCP, noncalcified plaque score.

(NOTE: Model 1 adjusted for age, race, and CVD risk factors. Model 2 adjusted for age, race, CVD risk factors, and BMI. OR = odds ratio per 10-units increase in fat volume. For HIV-infected participants, model 2 additionally adjusted for HIV-related factors.)

a Sample size for coronary CTA measurements: all = 707, HIV+ = 435, HIV− = 272.

b Within tSAT analysis, sample size: all = 708, HIV+ = 435, HIV− = 273.

c HIV interaction P < .05.

d HIV interaction P ≤ .01.

*P < .05; **P < .01.