. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0158942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158942

Table 4. ABTS^•+ radical scavenging capacity of S. ferruginea extracts. Data are expressed as μM Trolox/g extract.

		TEAC Value ^a
		Extractants
Plant part	Water	Methanol	Ethyl acetate	Hexane
Stem	1483.4 ± 4.05^ax	1477.2 ± 4.39^ax	1140.7 ± 7.33^bx	688.6 ± 4.05^cx
Leaf	1220.9 ± 8.16^ay	1435.0 ± 1.99^by	1012.7 ± 7.77^cy	456.7 ± 7.79^dy
Flower	1322.7 ± 3.78^az	1470.5 ± 4.49^bx	833.8 ± 9.71^cz	353.9 ± 4.40^dz

All analysis were performed in triplicate and expressed as means ± SD. For the same extract with different part of plant, means in the same column with different letters (x-z) are significantly different (p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). For different extracts with the same part of plant, means in the same row with different letters (a-d) show significant difference (p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).

Table 4. ABTS•+ radical scavenging capacity of S. ferruginea extracts. Data are expressed as μM Trolox/g extract.

Table 4. ABTS^•+ radical scavenging capacity of S. ferruginea extracts. Data are expressed as μM Trolox/g extract.