Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 23;15(3):324–330. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1128593

Table 1.

Incidental or deliberate DNA damage abrogates ES cell reprogramming potential.

ES cells: DNA damage: Control No Rad21 ko (24h) No  
ES cell # 100×106 100×106  
Somatic cell # 100×106 100×106  
Heterokaryon # ∼6×106* ∼6×106*  
Reprogramming
++
+++
 
ES cells: DNA damage:
Control No
Rad 21 ko (48h) Incidental
Doxorubicin Deliberate
ES cell # 25×106 25×106 25×106
Somatic cell # 25×106 25×106 25×106
Heterokaryon # ∼1.5×106* None None
Reprogramming ++ N/A N/A
*

Estimate based on 3% fusion efficiency determined by flow cytometry

Acutely cohesin-depleted ES cells not only retained the ability to reprogram somatic cells in heterokaryons but in addition showed an unexpected increase in their reprogramming potential (top, n = 3 biological replicates, 100 × 106 ES cells per fusion). 41 Fusion with Rad21 KO (48h) ES cells and doxorubicin-treated (6h) ES cells did not result in viable heterokaryon formation or reprogramming. Poor survival meant that lower ES cell numbers were available (25 × 106), and control ES cell numbers were reduced accordingly (bottom, n=2 biological replicates per treatment condition).