Skip to main content
. 2016 May 17;31:1499–1508. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3362-0

Table 2.

Tissue Doppler measurements

Characteristics Study population Dialysis vs. healthy controlsa Transplant recipient vs. healthy controlsa Dialysis vs. transplant recipient
Dialysis (n = 16) Transplant recipients (n = 15) Healthy controls (n = 27)
Mean difference [95 % CI] P value Mean difference [95 % CI] P value Mean difference [95 % CI] P value
IVS S′ 7.7 ± 1.7 7.8 ± 1.2 8.4 ± 1.0 0.5 [−0.4 to 1.5] 0.247 0.5 [−0.2 to 1.2] 0.16 0.1 [−1.0 to 1.3] 0.85
IVS E′ 10.3 ± 2.8 11.0 ± 1.2 14.0 ± 2.0 3.7 [2.0–5.4] <0.001 3.2 [1.8–4.4] <0.001 0.6 [−1.1 to 2.8] 0.47
LV S′ 8.1 ± 2.6 8.5 ± 1.8 9.2 ± 2.8 1.1 [-0.8 to 3.0] 0.26 0.9 [−0.9 to 2.6] 0.32 0.4 [−1.3 to 2.2] 0.61
LV E′ 13.7 ± 4.8 15.9 ± 3.0 19.3 ± 3.2 5.5 [2.8–8.2] <0.001 3.4 [1.2–5.5] 0.01 1.9 [−1.2 to 5.0] 0.21
Dialysis (n = 15) Transplant recipients (n = 13) Healthy controls (n = 23)
Septal E/E′ ratio 8.9 ± 3.7 8.3 ± 2.7 6.8 ± 2.6 1.5 [−0.8 to 3.8] 0.20 1.1 [−0.7 to 2.9] 0.24 0.4 [−1.9 to 2.5] 0.72
Mitral E/E′ ratio 6.6 ± 3.0 5.8 ± 2.4 5.0 ± 2.0 1.0 [−0.7 to 2.7] 0.23 0.3 [−1.1 to 1.6] 0.69 0.5 [−1.3 to 2.5] 0.55

Data are presented as the mean ± SD, unless indicated otherwise

CI confidence interval, IVS S′ interventricular septum peak systolic velocity, IVS E′, interventricular septum early diastolic velocity, LV S′ left ventricular (LV) wall peak systolic velocity, LV E′ LV early diastolic velocity

aGroups were compared using multiple linear regression analysis to adjust for confounding by BSA