Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 13;163(9):681–690. doi: 10.7326/M15-0557

Table 3.

Instrumental Variable Analysis of Differences Between BLS and ALS in Health Outcomes*

Variable Trauma Stroke AMI Respiratory Failure
30-d survival 3.7 (1.3 to 6.0) 5.3 (2.7 to 8.0) 4.8 (1.2 to 8.4) 4.2 (−0.9 to 9.4)
90-d survival 4.1 (1.3 to 6.9) 4.3 (1.3 to 7.3) 5.9 (2.2 to 9.6) 0.2 (−4.7 to 5.1)
1-y survival 1.8 (−1.4 to 5.0) 3.6 (0.4 to 6.8) 7.1 (2.6 to 11.6) −2.9 (−7.8 to 1.9)
2-y survival 2.4 (−1.3 to 6.1) 3.2 (−0.2 to 6.7) 8.4 (2.7 to 14.2) −2.4 (−7.2 to 2.3)
Poor neurologic performance −0.30 (−0.60 to 0.04) 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.5) −0.7 (−1.5 to 0.2) −0.6 (−2.5 to 1.2)

ALS = advanced life support; AMI = acute myocardial infarction; BLS = basic life support.

*

Instrumental variable estimates represent the effect on survival (in percentage points [95% CIs]) of receiving BLS rather than ALS for a “switcher” (i.e., a person who would receive BLS in an area with a higher rate of BLS use but ALS in an area with lower BLS use).