Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 13;163(9):681–690. doi: 10.7326/M15-0557

Table 4.

Differences Between BLS and ALS in 90-d Survival, by Trauma Subgroups*

Subgroup BLS, n ALS, n Survival Difference in Propensity Score Analysis (95% CI), percentage points Survival Difference in Instrumental Variable Analysis (95% CI), percentage points
Low severity 27 297 39 341 4.6 (4.0 to 5.3) 2.7 (−0.2 to 5.5)
High severity 3622 9427 14.7 (12.7 to 16.7) 12.5 (4.7 to 20.2)
Accidental falls 7568 11 947 4.8 (3.5 to 6.2) 7.1 (2.0 to 12.3)

ALS = advanced life support; BLS = basic life support.

*

Propensity score estimates are the difference in 90-d survival between BLS and ALS recipients, adjusted by propensity score–based balancing weights. The instrumental variable estimates represent the effect on survival of receiving BLS rather than ALS for a “switcher” (i.e., a person who would receive BLS in an area with a higher rate of BLS use but ALS in an area with lower BLS use). Accidental falls were analyzed only for 2010 and 2011, in which separate external-cause code fields existed and were complete for 92% of observations.

New Injury Severity Score between 16 and 24.

New Injury Severity Score between 25 and 75.