Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 14;5:e16412. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16412

Figure 3. Updated map showing areas most environmentally suitable for the zoonotic transmission of Ebola virus.

Areas closer to dark red (1) are most environmentally similar to locations reporting Ebola virus occurrences; areas in light yellow (0) are least similar. Countries with borders outlined are those which are predicted to contain at-risk areas for zoonotic transmission based on a thresholding approach. Output displayed generated from model using the three consolidated bat covariates.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16412.007

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Absolute differences between previous and revised maps.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Generated by subtracting the original eLife publication pixel probabilities from the newly generated values and restricted to those areas determined to be at-risk. Areas in yellow are essentially consistent. Areas in purple have probability values greater than the previous output; areas in green have probability values lower than previous outputs.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Zoonotic niche map based upon inclusion of individual bat covariate layers.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

Areas closer to dark red (1) are most environmentally similar to locations reporting Ebola virus occurrences; areas in light yellow (0) are least similar. Countries with borders outlined are those which are predicted to contain at-risk areas for zoonotic transmission based on a thresholding approach. Output displayed generated from model using individual bat covariate layers.
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure