Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Card Fail. 2016 Jan 14;22(9):738–742. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.01.007

Table 2. Change in Serum Bicarbonate and Frequency of Significant Rise in Serum Bicarbonate by Decongestion Strategy.

Trial/Decongestion Strategy Baseline Bicarbonate (mEq/L) Mean (SD) 72 or 96 hours Bicarbonate (mEq/L) Mean (SD) Change in Bicarbonate (mEq/L) Mean (SD) p-value*
DOSE-AHF
Bolus (N=117) 28.2 (4.2) 29.3 (3.8) 1.1 (3.5) 0.40
Infusion (N=108) 28.0 (4.2) 29.5 (4.0) 1.5 (3.8)
Low Dose (N=110) 28.0 (4.1) 29.0 (3.9) 1.0 (3.6) 0.10
High Dose (N-115) 28.2 (4.2) 29.8 (3.9) 1.6 (3.7)
ROSE-AHF
Dopamine (N=105) 27.4 (4.5) 30.0 (4.6) 2.5 (3.6) 0.37
Nesiritide (N=102) 27.0 (4.0) 29.0 (4.0) 2.1 (3.7)
Placebo (N=102) 27.4 (3.4) 29.7 (3.8) 2.2 (3.3)
CARRESS-HF
Stepped pharmacologic care (N=75) 27.9 (4.4) 31.2 (4.1) 3.3 (3.9) <0.001
Ultrafiltration (N=69) 28.1 (4.6) 27.2 (4.8) -0.9 (3.9)
*

p values obtained from linear regression model. Models were adjusting for baseline serum bicarbonate.