Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 12;111(1):50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.038

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Constant-strain MD simulations of the crystallographic unit cell under periodic boundary conditions. (a) Snapshot of the MD simulation illustrating the unit cell (blue box), the strained lattice constant |a|=D0(1+ϵ), and the component of the virial stress tensor parallel to the fibril axis, σ. (b) Time evolution of the σ in two different constant-strain simulations, one in which ϵ=0.011, and the other in which ϵ=0.047. The vertical lines represent fluctuations in σ observed over 2 ns time intervals. (c) Stress-strain relationship estimated for five different strain values. σ values are averages over the final 20 ns of the constant-strain simulations, and the standard errors are obtained via block averaging. (d) Relationship between the fractional change in the length of the triple-helix (L), and the applied strain, estimated from the final 20 ns of constant-strain simulations. L0 is the length of the triple helix in the zero-strain simulation. (e) Relationship between the gap fraction and the applied strain, estimated from the final 20 ns of constant-strain simulations. To see this figure in color, go online.