Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 12;25:1859–1876. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0

Table 2.

Studies evaluating psychometric performance of measures in the cancer caregiver population

Measure Version First author Year Study aim Population N Setting/country Administration
ACS 27-item Lambert [21] 2015 To examine the psychometric properties of the ACS Adult caregivers of advanced breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer diagnosed in the last six months 484 USA Reports baseline data from 484 participants and T2 data from 163 participants. Competed alongside other measures of caregiver burden, depression, benefit finding, coping, dyadic support and hopelessness
ACS Original 53-item (reduced to 27 after this analysis) Oberst [13] 1989 To examine family caregiving demands and caregivers’ appraisals of the caregiving experience Family caregivers of adults receiving radiotherapy as outpatients 47 USA Single time point alongside a measure of time spent in caregiving (also a new measure)
BASC Original 43-item (reduced to 14 items after this analysis) Glajchen [12] 2005 To develop a brief validated instrument that can measure caregiver distress and burden in a clinical setting Caregivers of patients with cancer (n = 56), neurological conditions (n = 16), mental health (n = 12) musculoskeletal (n = 2) COPD (n = 1) multiple conditions (n = 15) 102 USA Single time point alongside validation instruments measuring objective and subjective burden, spiritual health, physical health, satisfaction with patient care, social support, unmet need, mental health and impact of caregiving on quality of life (single item)
CQOLC 35-item Weitzner [14] 1999a To evaluate the reliability and validity of the caregiver quality of life index—cancer Primary family caregivers of patients with breast, lung or prostate cancer 263 USA 180 participants completed the questionnaires once; 83 (different) participants completed the questionnaires on two occasions 14 days apart. Questionnaire packs also include measures of perceived health and functioning, depression, anxiety, burden, social support, social desirability and a single-item measure for proxy reporting of the patient’s physical status and ambulatory ability
CQOLC 35-item Weitzner [22] 1999b To revalidate the caregiver quality of life instrument in home hospice care and demonstrate generalisability Family members of cancer patients who were receiving hospice services at home 239 USA Participants completed the questionnaire at a single time point along with a measure of perceived health and functioning (SF-36), a four-item quality of life instrument using a visual analogue scale and a single-item measure for proxy reporting of the patient’s physical status and ambulatory ability
CRA 40-item (reduced to 24 in this analysis) Given [15] 1992 Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysisa of new measure, test factorial invariance and construct validity Caregivers of patients with physical impairment (N = 267), Alzheimer’s disease (N = 211), cancer (N = 276) 754 USA Most participants completed at a single time point. 193 participants completed at 3 time points, baseline, 6 months and 12 months. CRA was completed alongside a measure of depression and activities of daily living
FACQ-PC 26-item (reduced to 25 items after this analysis) Cooper [10] 2006 To develop and validate a scale designed to measure the positive and negative components of caregiving for family caregivers of people receiving palliative care at home Adult family caregivers of a relative receiving palliative care 160 Australia Single time point. 160 caregivers completed the FACQ-PC, a subsample of 56 also completed validation measures of family functioning, positive and negative effect and subjective burden
QOL-F 37-item version Sherman [23] 2006 To establish the reliability of the quality of life instrument based on patients with AIDS, patients with cancer and AIDS and cancer family caregivers. To identify differences in quality of life between patients with AIDS and cancer and their family caregivers 81 family caregivers (38 cancer, 43 AIDS)
101 patients (38 cancer, 63 AIDS)
38 (only data on cancer caregivers used in this review) USA Presents data from baseline and month 3 of a longitudinal study. Only the target instrument appears to have been administered
QOLLTI-F 24-item (reduced to 16 items after this analysis)b Cohen [11] 2006 To develop and test measures of quality of life for family caregivers of palliative care patients Primary caregivers of palliative care patients 245 Canada Data collected at three time points. Measure completed alongside a two-item global measure of QoL
ZBI—multiple short versions 22-item Higginson [20] 2010 To assess the validity of 6 short-form versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in 3 caregiver populations Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer (n = 105), dementia (n = 131) acquired brain injury (n = 215) 105 (only data on cancer caregivers used) UK Data presented from one time point only. Short forms of ZBI compared with 22-item version as gold standard

aThe data on confirmatory factor analysis are also reported by Stommel and colleagues [24] which was identified in forward citation searches. This paper is excluded as it concerns the same data

bAuthors have now produced a second version of this questionnaire with minor changes and an additional question; however, the validation studies are as yet unpublished