Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;32(3):172–177. doi: 10.1159/000446486

Table 2.

Key trials for systemic escalation in neoadjuvant RT of rectal cancer

Reference Treatment n TME FU OS LRR pCR, % Comment
Aschele et al. [44] LC-CRT (+ ox) + surg vs. 747 yes n.a. n.a. n.a. 16 response analysis
STAR-01 LC-CRT + surg n.a. n.a. n.a. 16 survival not published yet

Gérard et al. [36] LC-CRT (+ ox) + surg vs. 598 yes 37 3 years: 87.6% 3 years: 4.4% 19.2
ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 LC-CRT + surg 3 years: 88.3% 3 years: 6.1% 13.9

Rödel et al. [41] LC-CRT (+ ox) + surg 1,236 yes 50 3 years: 88.7% 3 years: 2.9% 17a
CAO/ARO/AIO-04 LC-CRT + surg 3 years: 88.0% 3 years:4.6% 13a

Dewdney et al. [45] CHT + LC-CRT (+ ox + cet) + surg 90 yes 37 2 years: 91.3%a 3 years: 2.2% 11
EXPERT-C CHT + LC-CRT (+ ox) + surg 32 2 years: 81.8%a 3 years: 4.5% 9
a

Statistically significant.

n = Patient number; TME = total mesorectal excision; FU = median follow-up; OS = overall survival; LRR = local relapse rate; pCR = pathological complete remission; ox = oxaliplatin; surg = surgery; cet = cetuximab; LC-CRT = long-course chemoradiotherapy (5-FU- or capecitabine-based); CHT = chemotherapy; n.a. = not applicable.