Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 21;22(27):6173–6191. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6173

Table 1.

Results of endoscopic management of biliary complications after adult living donor liver transplantation: A review of the literature

Ref.1 Type of biliary complication Initial technical success, n (%)2 Final therapeutic success, n (%)3 Recurrence at a mean follow-up months, n (%)4 Endoscopic treatment modality Number of ERC session per patient5 Duration for final success (mo)5 Factors affecting endoscopic treatment outcomes
Hisatsune et al[41] D-D Stricture 14/22 (63.6) 2/14 (14.3) - IS 1 12 Number of the proximal duct at D-D
Shah et al[35] D-D Stricture 3/4 (75.0) 3/3 (100) - BD and/or PS 1.5 2.3
Leakage 8/8 (100) 8/8 (100) - PS with/without ES 2 1.4
Zoepf et al[26] D-D Stricture 7/12 (58.3) 7/7 (100) 1/7 (14.3) at 10.0 BD and/or PS 3.5 8
Yazumi et al[12] D-D Stricture 48/75 (64.0) 28/55 (50.9) 3/28 (10.7) at 1.8 IS with/without BD - 9 Crane-neck deformity
Leakage 13/16 (50.0) 8/13 (61.5) - ENBD - 0.6 Non-anastomotic stricture
Tsujino et al[11] D-D Stricture 12/17 (70.6) 9/12 (75.0) 4/9 (44.4) at 10.1 BD with ENBD/IS 4.1 -
Lee et al[22] D-D Stricture 12/17 (70.6) 7/14 (50.0) 0/7 (0.0) at 13.1 BD with ENBD/PS 3.9 7.2 Stricture
Sharp angulation of D-D
Leakage 11/13 (84.6) 9/11 (81.8) 0/9 (0.0) at 13.1 PS or ENBD 2.2 3 Concomitant bile leakage
Tarantino et al[16] D-D Stricture 14/20 (70.0) 7/14 (64.3) - BD with double PS 3.4 - Continuous bile leakage despite PS
Leakage 11/13 (33.3) 3/4 (75.0) - ES with PS 2.3 - Persistence of stricture after 1 yr
Both 4/6 (66.7) 0/4 (0.0) - - - -
Kato et al[59] D-D Stricture 31/41 (75.6) 28/35 (80.0) 7/28 (25.0) at 9.3 BD with PS 4 14.5 Concomitant bile leakage
Kim et al[40] D-D Stricture - 38/60 (63.3) 5/38 (13.2) at 7.9 BD with PS 3 - Shape of distal duct at D-D: pouched
Kobayashi et al[66] D-D Stricture - 7/16 (43.8) - - - - Delayed diagnosis of stricture
Seo et al[43] D-D Stricture 15/26 (57.6) 20/29 (68.9) 6/20 (30.0) at 28.0 BD with PS 2.3 6.8 Late onset over 24 wk
Delayed diagnosis of stricture
Short duration of biliary stenting
Gómez et al[18] D-D Stricture 4/10 (40.0) 2/4 (50.0) - BD with/without PS 2 -
Leakage 3/4 (75.0) 3/3 (100) - ES with/without PS 3 -
Chang et al[28] D-D Stricture 63/101 (62.4) 48/90 (53.3) - BD with PS 3.2 11 Non-anastomotic stricture
Hepatic artery stenosis
Lee et al[23] D-D Stricture 64/137 (46.7) 38/68 (55.9) - PS or ENBD 4.8 - Stricture-to-ERC interval
Morphology of stricture
: narrow, separate duct, nonvisualized
Shape of distal duct at D-D: round tip
Kim et al[61] D-D Stricture 82/147 (55.8) 52/141 (36.9) 6/52 (11.5) at 21.1 BD with PS 6.3 12.7 Early onset within 1 yr after LDLT
Yaprak et al[58] D-D Stricture - 7/13 (53.8) - - - - Long length of stricture
Leakage - 5/7 (71.4) - - - - More than 1 bile duct anastomosis
Chan et al[142] D-D Stricture 8/8 (100) 6/8 (75.0) 0/6 (0.0) at 3.0 BD with PS 4.7 4.2 Disuse of intraoperative biliary stent
Kurita et al[67] D-D Stricture 94/118 (79.7) 81/92 (88.0) 8/81 (9.9) at 53.0 BD with IS 1.4 6.3 Use of ES
Hsieh et al[71] D-D Stricture 32/38 (84.2) 38/38 (100) 8/38 (21.1) at 9.45 BD and maximal PS 4 5.3 Right lobe liver graft
High-grade stricture
Sharp angulation of D-D
Conventional PS vs maximal PS
Chok et al[37] D-D Stricture - 41/56 (73.2) - BD with/without PS 3 - Younger recipient age
Longer operation time
Shape of distal duct at D-D: pouched
Initial bile leakage
Na et al[24] D-D Stricture 53/65 (81.5) 112/129 (86.8) - BD and maximal PS 3.2 - Early period of transplant experience
- 59/64 (92.2) - Rendezvous - -
Chang et al[86] D-D Stricture 20/20 (100) 13/20 (65.0) - Rendezvous 2 7.2 Sharp or twisted angle at stricture
Mita et al[77] C-J Stricture 7/22 (31.8) - 0/7 (0.0) at 13.3 BD 2 2.5 Tube jejunostomy in long Roux limb
(deep enteroscopy)
Kamei et al[82] C-J Stricture 5/9 (55.6) 7/9 (77.8) 4/7 (57.1) at 27.6 BD 2.1 - Use of a single ERC intervention
(deep enteroscopy)
Jang et al[97] D-D Stricture 10/12 (83.3) 10/10 (100) 1/9 (11.1) at 3.3 Magnetic compression anastomosis - 2.5 Length of stricture
: magnet approximation : recanalization LDLT-to-ERC interval
9/10 (90.0) 6.1 Architecture of the bile duct
: stent-free Strength of the magnet
1

References: Author, Type of biliary reconstruction in study population;

2

Initial technical success, n (%): patients who underwent successful ERC intervention/patients receiving a first session of ERC (excluding prior transhepatic rendezvous);

3

Final therapeutic success, n (%): patients who achieved cholangiographic resolution without need for further endoscopic, surgical, percutaneous procedures (e.g., stent-free) / patients treated by ERC interventions;

4

Recurrence, n (%): patients with recurrent biliary problems with cholangiographic evidence and the need for subsequent intervention/patients who resolved;

5

Values are expressed as mean. BD: Balloon dilatation; C-J: Biliary anastomosis with Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy; D-D: Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis; ENBD: Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage; ERC: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; ES: Endoscopic sphincterotomy; IS: Inside-stent placement above the intact sphincter of Oddi; PS: Plastic stent placement.