Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;63(3):414–422. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw291

Table 2.

Artemisinin Pharmacokinetics Following a 6-Dose Regimen of Artemether-Lumefantrine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Uninfected and HIV-Infected Children

Pharmacokinetic Parameter HIV-Uninfected
HIV-Infected
Ratio (P Value)
No ART (n = 51a) EFV (n = 31) LPV/r (n = 30b) NVP (n = 30) EFV/No ART LPV/No ART NVP/No ART
Artemether
Cmax, ng/mL 35.3 (28.0–44.5) 15.3 (11.2–21.1) 26.4 (19.1–36.4) 10.2 (7.6–13.8) 0.43 (.0006) 0.75 (.23) 0.29 (<.0001)
Tmax, h 2.0 (.7–3.0) 2.1 (1.1–4.0) 3.0 (1.1–4.0) 2.1 (1.1–3.1) 1.1 (.22) 1.5 (.18) 1.1 (.29)
AUC0–8h, h × ng/mL 120 (97.6–147) 48.5 (37.2–63.1) 89.7 (68.6–117) 36.3 (27.8–47.4)c 0.40 (<.0001) 0.75 (.16) 0.30 (<.0001)
C24h, ng/mL 1.2 (.7–1.7) BLQ (BLQ–.8) 1.2 (.6–2.5) BLQ (BLQ–1.1) <1 (<.0001) 0.98 (.96) <1 (<.0001)
DHA
Cmax, ng/mL 66.9 (53.6–83.5) 24.0 (18.0–32.0) 55.3 (41.3–74.1) 45.5 (34.1–60.8) 0.36 (<.0001) 0.83 (.39) 0.68 (.08)
Tmax, h 2.9 (2.0–3.1) 3.0 (1.1–4.0) 3.0 (2.0–4.1) 2.2 (2.0–4.0) 1.0 (.75) 1.0 (.99) 0.80 (.31)
AUC0–8h, h × ng/mL 212 (176–256) 62.9 (49.2–80.3)c 171 (133–219) 137 (107–175) 0.30 (<.0001) 0.81 (.25) 0.65 (.02)
C8h, ng/mL 6.5 (4.6–8.0) 1.2 (.6–3.4) 9.3 (4.6–16.5) 4.5 (2.9–8.8) 0.19 (<.0001) 1.42 (.16) 0.681 (.41)
AUC ratio (DHA/AR) 1.7 (1.3–2.5) 1.6 (.8–2.2) 1.9 (1.5–3.4) 4.1 (2.2–6.9) 0.94 (.07) 1.12 (.74) 2.41 (<.0001)

Data are presented as geometric mean (90% confidence interval) unless otherwise specified. Significance level: α = .0083 (0.05/6); Tmax, C8h, and C24h reported as median (interquartile range); mixed-models repeated-measures analysis to compare between all groups using log-transformed geometric means.

Abbreviations: AR, artemether; ART, antiretroviral therapy; AUC, area under the concentration-time curve; BLQ, below the limit of quantitation; Cmax, maximal concentration; DHA, dihydroartemisinin; EFV, efavirenz; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LPV, lopinavir; NVP, nevirapine; r, ritonavir; Tmax, time to maximal concentration.

a n = 53 for C24h, n = 49 for C8h.

b n = 29 for C8h.

c One subject in the group did not have sufficient points for AUC8h due to being below the lower limit of quantification; AUC last was used.