Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;7:110. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00110

Table 1.

Sleep parameters were compared among the devices/conditions.

Bland–Altman
Correlation analysis
Bias (95% limits of agreement) Pearson r P (two-tailed)
(A) Sleep duration
SS −10.8 (−85.18 ± 63.58) 0.7286 0.0003 ***
Act80 18.9 (−60.55 ± 98.35) 0.5534 0.0114 *
Act40 −13 (−105.2 ± 79.24) 0.4246 0.062 ns
Act20 −52.6 (−159.5 ± 54.3) 0.3975 0.0826 ns
MTN-B −65.4 (−214 ± 83.21) 0.3131 0.1789 ns
MTN-W −159 (−316.2 ± −1.842) 0.2821 0.2281 ns
(B) Sleep latency
SS 14.9 (−49.54 ± 79.34) 0.3597 0.1193 ns
Act80 2.3 (−24.33 ± 28.93) 0.1851 0.4347 ns
Act40 8.5 (−63.3 ± 80.3) 0.2434 0.3011 ns
Act20 8.8 (−22.62 ± 40.22) 0.2518 0.2841 ns
MTN-B 15.3 (−26.87 ± 57.47) 0.1626 0.4935 ns
MTN-W 23.2 (−27.25 ± 73.65) 0.06577 0.7829 ns
(C) WASO
SS −3.4 (−83.33 ± 76.53) 0.6397 0.0024 **
Act80 −24.6 (−106.6 ± 57.38) 0.5259 0.0172 *
Act40 2.5 (−93.77 ± 98.77) 0.3694 0.1089 ns
Act20 38.2 (−76.5 ± 152.9) 0.3204 0.1685 ns
MTN-B 40.9 (−96.4 ± 178.2) 0.2793 0.2331 ns
MTN-W 124.5 (−59.14 ± 308.1) 0.2198 0.3517 ns

Bland–Altman analysis and correlation analysis were conducted against estimations by various methods. Panel (A) shows result for sleep duration, (B) for sleep latency, and (C) for WASO.

WASO, wake after sleep onset.