Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):917–927. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094

Table 2.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds Ratios, P Values, and 95% Confidence Intervals From Simple and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses Assessing the Associations Between Selected Demographic and Reproductive Characteristics and U.S. Women’s Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Methods,* 2012 (n=5,601)

Demographic Characteristic Unadjusted OR 95% CI Adjusted OR 95% CI
Race–ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic
 Black, non-Hispanic 0.7 0.5–1.0 0.6 0.4–0.9
 Other or multiple races, non-Hispanic 0.9 0.5–1.7 0.6 0.3–1.2
 Hispanic 1.4 0.9–2.0 0.7 0.5–1.2
Income as a % of federal poverty level
 Less than 100%
 100–199% 1.0 0.7–1.5 1.1 0.7–1.7
 200–299% 0.7 0.5–1.1 0.9 0.6–1.4
 300% or higher 0.8 0.5–1.1 1.3 0.8–2.3
Age (y)
 15–19
 20–24 3.5 1.4–8.6
 25–29 4.4 1.8–11.0 0.9 0.6–1.5
 30–34 4.3 1.7–10.7
 35–39 2.4 0.9–6.3 0.3§ 0.2–0.6
 40–44 1.3 0.5–3.6
Born outside the United States
 No
 Yes 1.7 1.1–2.7 1.6 1.0–2.8
Region
 Northeast
 South 0.9 0.6–1.3 1.1 0.7–1.6
 Midwest 1.0 0.6–1.7 1.1 0.7–1.8
 West 1.9 1.2–2.9 1.8* 1.2–2.9
Relationship status
 Not married or cohabitating
 Married 1.4 1.0–2.1
 Cohabitating 1.5 1.0–2.2
Education
 No high school diploma
 High school or high school equivalency certificate 1.1 0.6–1.9
 Some college 1.1 0.6–2.0
 College graduate 1.0 0.6–1.9
Employment
 Not working full-time
 Working full-time 1.0 0.7–1.3
Current insurance coverage
 Private
 Medicaid 1.0 0.7–1.4
 Other 1.3 0.8–2.2
 None 1.2 0.8–1.8
Religious affiliation
 No religion
 Catholic 1.1 0.7–1.8
 Protestant 1.1 0.8–1.7
 Other religions 1.7 1.0–2.9
No. of male sexual partners in previous year
 Fewer than 2
 2 or more 0.6 0.4–0.9
Ever experienced unwanted pregnancy
 No
 Yes 1.2 0.8–1.8
Total no. of live births
 0
 1–2 3.2§ 2.0–5.0 5.5§ 3.1–9.6
 3 or more 1.9 1.1–3.5 4.3§ 2.0–9.4
Intentions for future birth(s)
 No
 Yes 1.2 0.9–1.7
Ever stopped using non-LARC hormonal method due to dissatisfaction?
 No
 Yes 2.1§ 1.6–2.9 1.9§ 1.4–2.6

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; LARC, long-acting reversible contraception.

*

Population includes all female respondents who reported current contraceptive method use weighted to reflect the U.S. female civilian population of the United States. The final multivariable model included the following variables: race–ethnicity, income as a percent of federal poverty level, age, born outside the United States, region, total number of live births, and ever having stopped using a non-LARC hormonal method as a result of dissatisfaction.

Possible significant difference at P<.05, needs further study.

Significant difference at P<.01.

§

Significant difference at P<.001.

Other types of insurance include Medicare, military health care, or other forms of government health care (not including Indian Health Service).