Skip to main content
. 2016 May 31;128(2):297–312. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-706317

Table 2.

Patient characteristics and outcomes in the discovery (n = 110) and validation (n = 94) cohorts: validation cohort

1-y overall survival 1-y relapse
n Probability (%) HR (95%CI) (risk of death) Cumulative incidence (%) HR (95%CI) (risk of relapse)
Age* P = .09 P = .35
 ≤40 y 44 55.0 1 21.1 1
 >40 y 50 31.1 1.27 (0.72-1.90) 25.5 1.02 (0.45-2.30)
Sex P = .61 P = .19
 Male 54 40.0 1 19.5 1
 Female 40 43.7 0.78 (.45-1.37) 27.3 1.67 (0.77-3.61)
Diagnosis P = .51 P = .23
 AML 39 43.6 1 33.3 1
 Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 25 40.0 0.96 (0.50-18.5) 40.1 1.27 (0.53-2.78)
 Myelodysplastic syndromes 5 80.0 0.26 (0.21-1.81) 20.0 0.55 (0.07-4.20)
 Lymphoproliferative disorder 16 37.5 1.19 (0.57-2.53) 16.2 0.14 (0.2-1.18)
 Chronic myeloid leukemia 9 56.6 0.62 (.21-1.81) 12.5 0.30 (0.04-2.32)
Disease status at transplant P = .04 P = .02
 Complete remission 52 48.9 1 17.8 1
 Refractory/relapsed disease 42 34.2 1.47 (1.09-2.56) 33.2 1.84 (1.13-4.22)
Conditioning regimen P = .87 P = .65
 Myeloablative 73 40.9 1 25.1 1
 Nonmyeloablative 21 47.4 1.09 (0.63-1.71) 17.6 0.85 (0.42-1.88)
Graft P = .73 P = .73
 Double cord 88 40.5 1 31.9 1
 Single cord 6 66.7 0.91 (0.50-1.68) 16.7 0.84 (0.23-1.86)
CMV status P = .78 P = .44
 Seronegative 16 42.9 1 43.2 1
 Seropositive 76 42.3 0.99 (0.77-1.36) 29.1 0.65 (0.20-1.91)
HLA match between recipient and dominant CB unit§ P = .11 P = .26
 7-8/8 10 75.1 1 20.1 1
 5-6/8 31 36.8 1.61 (0.96-4.71) 36.8 1.4 (0.84-2.33)
 ≤4/8 43 38.2 1.79 (0.91-3.54) 18.6 0.99 (0.70-1.24)
Total mononuclear cells infused|| P = .91 P = .73
 ≤3.8 × 108/kg 42.9 1 26.8 1
 >3.8 × 108/kg 39.0 0.97 (0.55-1.70) 24.4 0.862 (0.37-2.03)
Patient HLA C group,# P = .002 P < .001
C1/C1 38 50.0 1 22.2 1
C1/C2 40 52.0 0.91 (0.47-1.76) 18.1 0.83 (0.30-2.34)
C2/C2 16 12.5 2.73 (1.30-5.75) 68.7 5.34 (1.96-14.50)
Patient HLA C group P < .001 P < .001
C1/x 78 51.3 1 19.5 1
C2/C2 16 12.5 2.90 (1.56-5.38) 68.7 5.98 (2.73-13.10)
Patients receiving CB grafts with the combined HLA-C1-KIR2DL2/L3/S2 genotype P = .07 P = .05
 Yes 37 56.8 1 16.2 1
 No 57 36.8 1.70 (0.94-3.07) 35.7 2.38 (0.96-5.94)
HLA-C1/x patients receiving CB grafts with the combined HLA-C1-KIR2DL2/L3/S2 genotype P = .02 P = .01
 Yes 31 67.7 1 6.5 1
 No 47 40.4 2.33 (1.13-4.81) 28.3 5.02 (1.13-22.26)
HLA match between recipient and dominant CB unit§ P = .11 P = .26
 7-8/8 10 75.1 1 20.1 1
 5-6/8 31 36.8 1.61 (0.96-4.71) 36.8 1.4 (0.84-2.33)
 ≤4/8 43 38.2 1.79 (0.91-3.54) 18.6 0.99 (0.70-1.24)
Patients received CB grafts with the combined HLA-C2-KIR2DL1/S1 genotype P = .54 P = .20
 Yes 35 46.6 1 23.1 1
 No 59 41.7 1.19 (0.68-2.07) 34.1 1.31 (0.76-2.01)
*

Median age was 41.0 y (range, 1-73).

Five patients had chronic lymphocytic leukemia; 5 patients had Hodgkin disease, and 6 patients had non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Two patients had missing data.

§

The identity of the dominant CB unit could not be ascertained in 10 cases.

||

The median value for the total of nucleated cells infused was 3.8 × 108/kg (range, 1.5 × 108/kg to 34.2 × 108/kg).

The P values for the comparisons of outcomes in C1/C1 vs C2/C2 patients were P = .007 for OS and P < .001 for cumulative incidence of progression.

#

The P values for the comparisons of outcomes in C1/C2 vs C2/C2 patients were P = .001 for OS and P < .001 for cumulative incidence of progression.