Table 1.
Case reports of forearm intravascular glomus tumor
| Author (year) | Country | Age, gender | Immunohistology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beham and Fletcher (1991) [6] | Austria | 40, Male | Positive for vimentin, actin, myosin, S-100 protein and neurofilaments |
| Googe and Griffin (1993) [7] | USA | 66, Male | Positive for vimentin, smooth muscle actin and muscle specific actin; negative for desmin, factor VIII-related antigen, epithelial membrane antigen, cytokeratins, S-100 protein and chromogranin |
| Acebo et al. (1997) [8] | Spain | 79, Female | Positive for vimentin, alpha-smooth-muscle actin and collagen IV |
| Lee et al. (2010) [9] | Canada | 81, Male | Smooth muscle actin immunoreactivity but negative for keratin and S-100 |
| George et al. (2012) [10] | UK | 65, Male | Positive staining with smooth muscle actin, vimentin and CD34. They did not stain with S-100, MNF-116 or CD31. Reticulin and elastic Van Gieson stains highlighted the involvement of the vein wall described. |
| Temiz et al. (2016) [1] | India | Two cases out of 5a | Not mentioned |
| Lee et al. (2014) [5] | South Korea | 44, Female | Smooth muscle actin |
| Present case | Qatar | 45, Female | Positive for actin and S-100 protein |
aDetails of individual cases were not mentioned.