. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Mar 8;34(7):846–854. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.03.002

Table II.

Comparison of percentage fibrosis calculated from the fully sampled image and the image reconstructed from R=3.5 for four pre-ablation datasets. The percentage fibrosis calculated from the fully sampled data matches those calculated from R=3.5 well. The classification of patients based on the percentage fibrosis calculated from R=3.5 matches the classification from the fully sampled data.

	Full Image	Classification	R=3.5	Classification
Dataset Pre-1	14.3%	Utah II	17.9%	Utah II
Dataset Pre-2	7.2%	Utah I	6.2%	Utah I
Dataset Pre-3	8.4%	Utah I	6.4%	Utah I
Dataset Pre-4	15.5%	Utah II	15.4%	Utah II