Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):1098–1102. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001549

Table 3.

Concordance between actual treatment and blind review treatment recommendations, Group 1 (False Negative Axillary Ultrasound) and Group 2 (True Negative Axillary Ultrasound)

Group 1 Group 2 p-value
Overall Actual and #1 65% (40/62) 73% (44/60) 0.332
Actual and #2 74% (46/62) 62% (37/60) 0.175
#1 and #2 76% (47/62) 72% (43/60) 0.682
ER+, Age > 50 Actual and #1 58% (25/43) 84% (37/44) 0.009
Actual and #2 65% (28/43) 68% (30/44) 0.822
#1 and #2 74% (32/43) 68% (30/44) 0.637
HER2+ Actual and #1 55% (6/11) 50% (3/6) > 0.99
Actual and #2 64% (7/11) 50% (3/6) 0.644
#1 and #2 64% (7/11) 100% (6/6) 0.237
TNBC Actual and #1 67% (4/6) 36.4% (4/11) 0.335
Actual and #2 100% (6/6) 45.5% (5/11) 0.043
#1 and #2 67% (4/6) 82% (9/11) 0.584

ER, estrogen receptor; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer; #1, Medical oncologist #1; #2, Medical oncologist #2