Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 20;27:1137–1147. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2890-7

Table 5.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation

Product HMW-HA 0.08 % (Cystistat®) 2 % CS (Uracyst®-Uropol S®) i-PPS 300 mg (Elmiron®) i-PPS 200 mg + o-PPS 400 mg (Elmiron®)
Study Shao et al. [34] Nickel et al. [35] Nickel et al. [36] Bade et al. [37] Davis et al. [38]
Cost per instillation 1 1 1 0.4 0.6
Number of instillations 6 6 8 24 36
Cost of treatment (CT) 6 6 8 9.6 21.6
%Responders placebo/control 0.182 0.233 0.313 0.200 0.90
%Responders active treatment 0.933 0.4145 0.38 0.40 0.857
Odds ratio (95%IC) 76.5 (6.08; 963.06) 2.33 (0.76; 7.17) 1.35 (0.58; 3.11) 3.19 (0.42; 24.38) 0.67 (0.10; 4.48)
Absolute risk reduction (95%CI) − 0.75 (−1–0; −0.50) −0.18 (−2.88; 0.18) −0.07 (−0.26; 0.12) −0.20 (−0.59; 0.19) 0.04 (−0.16; 0.24)
NNT (95%CI) 1.33 (1.0; 2.0) 5.51 (2.4; 18.84) 14.81 (3.92; 8.31) 2.67 (0.36; 19.71) −23.33 (−4.13; 6.40)
Cost-effectiveness (CT/%responders) 6.43 14.49 21.05 21.62 25.20
Cost efficacy (CT aNNTs) 7.98 33.06 118.48 25.63 503.93

HMW-HA high molecular weight hyaluronic acid, CS chondroitin sulphate, i-PPS intravesical pentosan polysulphate, o-PPS oral pentosan polysulphate, NNT number needed to treat to obtain a response

aResponse rates correspond to those presented in the articles [29, 30, 31, 33] and/or calculated by total of responders/total patients with per protocol results [32]