Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 1;18(7):e149. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4657

Table 3.

Distribution of topics.

Topic Percentage of PHIs who discussed a specific topic (%) Percentage of reference in relation to overall references
(%)
Percentage of reference in relation to overall conversation size (%)
Barriers impeding PHI’s work 100.0 13.6 16.7
Epidemiology about dengue 100.0 9.4 13.6
Process of PHI’s work 100.0 19.4 21.1
Prevention of dengue 96.4 5.4 8.9
Knowledge about dengue (PHIs) 92.9 5.1 7.0
Education materials about dengue 89.3 8.0 9.3
Attitude of public towards PHIs 86.0 6.4 6.0
Equipment used for dengue tasks 85.7 5.6 8.0
Profile of PHI 85.7 2.5 7.7
Suggestion for mobile app 85.7 6.3 7.6
Responsibility of PHIs 78.6 4.4 4.5
Facilitators to PHI’s work 71.4 2.6 3.8
Client interaction with PHIs 68.0 3.0 6.0
Burden of dengue 67.9 2.0 3.0
Knowledge about dengue (public) 67.9 1.9 2.9
Trust among clients on PHIs 50.0 1.4 1.4
Story from PHI’s work life 46.4 1.0 3.5
Diseases related to mosquitoes 39.3 0.9 2.8
Technology use of PHIs 25.0 0.4 0.5
Demographic factors 14.3 0.4 0.4
Client satisfaction 10.7 0.3 1.0