Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;7:1040. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01040

Table 2.

Similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER) between treatments.

Control with water mean dissimilarity 72%
OTU Control mean abundance Water mean abundance Mean dissimilarity % Contribution Cumulative % Taxonomic assignment

361352 26085 107286 18.83 26.31 26.31 Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria (class); Actinomycetales; Streptomycetaceae; Streptomyces platensis
361219 5073 22237 3.95 5.52 31.83 Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria (class); Actinomycetales; Streptomycetaceae; Streptomyces lienomycini
362477 2443 15667 2.57 3.60 35.43 Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria (class); Actinomycetales; Streptomycetaceae; Streptomyces violaceolatus

Control with OM mean dissimilarity 78%

OTU Control mean abundance OM mean abundance Mean dissimilarity % Contribution Cumulative % Taxonomic assignment

51667 36 75736 6.75 8.65 8.65 Firmicutes; Bacilli; Lactobacillales; Carnobacteriaceae; Carnobacterium sp. AT7
361352 26085 33674 5.69 7.29 15.95 Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria (class); Actinomycetales; Streptomycetaceae; Streptomyces platensis
51664 13 47128 4.20 5.39 21.34 Firmicutes; Bacilli; Lactobacillales; Carnobacteriaceae; Carnobacterium maltaromaticum

Water with OM mean dissimilarity 75%

OTU Water mean abundance OM mean abundance Mean dissimilarity % Contribution Cumulative % Taxonomic assignment

361352 107286 33674 14.52 19.30 19.30 Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria (class); Actinomycetales; Streptomycetaceae; Streptomyces platensis
51667 13.5 75736 6.47 8.60 27.91 Firmicutes; Bacilli; Lactobacillales; Carnobacteriaceae; Carnobacterium sp. AT7
51664 1.5 47128 4.03 5.36 33.27 Firmicutes; Bacilli; Lactobacillales; Carnobacteriaceae; Carnobacterium maltaromaticum

Mean dissimilarity among samples = 51%.