Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;10(5):375–385. doi: 10.1111/irv.12393

Table 3.

Bivariate analysis of the meteorological factors associated with influenza activity in Kenya, January 2007–December 2013

Association with the onset of influenza activity Absolute association with influenza activity
Odds Ratio (95% CI) P‐value Incidence Rate Ratio (95% CI) P‐value
Year 0·233a <0·001a
2007 0·70 (0·23–2·15) 0·538 0·45 (0·37–0·55) <0·001
2008 0·74 (0·30–1·84) 0·516 0·78 (0·64–0·94) 0·010
2009 0·34 (0·10–1·18) 0·089 0·79 (0·62–1·00) 0·048
2010 0·31 (0·07–1·36) 0·120 0·96 (0·79–1·16) 0·649
2011 Ref Ref
2012 0·99 (0·46–2·11) 0·979 0·60 (0·49–0·74) <0·001
2013 0·42 (0·14–1·27) 0·125 0·69 (0·56–0·85) <0·001
Week 0·98 (0·97–1·00) 0·123 1·00 (0·99–1·00) 0·285
Site 0·813a <0·001a
St. Elizabeth Hospital Ref Ref
Tabitha Clinic (Kibera) 1·52 (0·56–4·12) 0·410 1·70 (1·36–2·11) <0·001
Nyeri CRH 0·75 (0·19–2·85) 0·667 0·83 (0·64–1·08) 0·169
Kakamega CRH 1·00 (0·30–3·37) 1·000 1·07 (0·83–1·36) 0·609
Nakuru CRH 1·13 (0·39–3·30) 0·825 0·77 (0·61–0·97) 0·025
Siaya CRH 1·10 (0·35–3·41) 0·871 0·67 (0·53–0·85) 0·001
Dadaab refugee camp 1·44 (0·37–5·57) 0·594 0·94 (0·73–1·22) 0·649
Kakuma refugee camp 1·05 (0·38–2·94) 0·924 0·88 (0·71–1·09) 0·238
Kilifi County Referral Hospital 0·49 (0·15–1·66) 0·253 0·25 (0·19–0·33) <0·001
Temperature (°C)
No lag 0·99 (0·93–1·05) 0·682 0·97 (0·95–0·98) <0·001
Lag 1 week 0·98 (0·92–1·04) 0·484 0·96 (0·95–0·98) <0·001
Lag 2 weeks 0·97 (0·91–1·04) 0·350 0·96 (0·95–0·98) <0·001
Lag 3 weeks 0·97 (0·91–1·04) 0·346 0·96 (0·95–0·98) <0·001
Lag 4 weeks 0·97 (0·91–1·04) 0·394 0·96 (0·95–0·98) <0·001
Specific humidity (g/kg)
No lag 0·86 (0·75–0·98) 0·031 0·86 (0·84–0·89) <0·001
Lag 1 week 0·82 (0·71–0·94) 0·004 0·85 (0·83–0·88) <0·001
Lag 2 weeks 0·84 (0·73–0·96) 0·013 0·85 (0·82–0·87) <0·001
Lag 3 weeks 0·89 (0·78–1·02) 0·108 0·84 (0·82–0·87) <0·001
Lag 4 weeks 0·86 (0·75–0·99) 0·035 0·84 (0·82–0·86) <0·001
Accumulated rainfall (mm)
No lag 1·00 (0·99–1·01) 0·807 1·00 (1·00–1·00) 0·360
Lag 1 week 0·99 (0·98–1·00) 0·115 1·00 (1·00–1·00) 0·268
Lag 2 weeks 1·00 (1·00–1·01) 0·409 1·00 (1·00–1·00) 0·074
Lag 3 weeks 1·00 (0·99–1·01) 0·677 1·00 (1·00–1·00) 0·138
Lag 4 weeks 1·00 (0·99–1·01) 0·811 1·00 (1·00–1·00) 0·106
Presence of cold–dry conditionsb
No lag 8·17e‐06 (0–) 0·295 1·65 (1·09–2·50) 0·019
Lag 1 week 8·17e‐06 (0–) 0·295 2·05 (1·10–3·83) 0·024
Lag 2 weeks 8·17e‐06 (0–) 0·295 1·58 (0·98–2·53) 0·059
Lag 3 weeks 8·17e‐06 (0–) 0·295 2·12 (1·13–4·01) 0·020
Lag 4 weeks 8·18e‐06 (0–) 0·319 1·25 (0·74–2·11) 0·401
a

Overall P‐value.

b

Cold–dry periods were defined as weeks when the average temperature was <18°C and specific humidity was <11 g/kg.