Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2015 Nov 13;122(3):470–476. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29786

Table 3.

Encounters (N=361)

Percentage of n=361 encounters Percentage where there was provider activity communication – unadjusted p-value1 Odds Ratio for PA communication (95 CI) – adjusted analysis p-value2
Clinician Gender
 Female 243 (67%) 34% p=0.64 Reference
 Male 120 (33%) 37% 1.14 (0.36, 3.6) p=0.82
Clinician Training
 MD/DO 234 (65%) 34% p=0.57 Reference
 NP/PA 129 (35%) 37% 0.60 (0.21, 1.74) p=0.35
Clinician Specialty
 Medical Oncology 172 (47%) 55% p<0.0001
 Radiation Oncology 71 (20%) 13%
 Surgical Oncology 94 (26%) 19%
 Urology 24 (7%) 21%
Disease Site
 Breast 271 (75%) 37% p=0.20 Reference
 Colon 32 (9%) 38% 0.38 (0.09, 1.67) p=0.20
 Prostate 60 (17%) 25% 0.17 (0.02, 1.32) p=0.09
Patient Gender
 Female 289 (80%) 37% p=0.22 Reference
 Male 74 (20%) 28% 1.46 (0.28, 7.54) p=0.65
Patient Race
 White 254 (70%) 35% p=0.21 Reference
 AA 81 (22%) 40% 1.31 (0.72, 2.39) p=0.37
 Other/unknown 28 (8%) 21%
Patient Age Group
 <50 89 (25%) 23% p<0.001 1.41 (1.11, 1.81) p=0.006
 50–59 104 (29%) 34%
 60–69 95 (26%) 40%
 70–79 53 (15%) 45%
 >80 20 (6%) 50%
Current Treatment
 Surveillance 79 (22%) 46% p<0.0001 0.96 (0.43, 2.13) p=0.92
 Surgery 101 (28%) 19% 0.2 (0.08, 0.5) p<0.001
 Chemotherapy 35 (10%) 37% 0.52 (0.2, 1.33) p=0.17
 Radiation 53 (15%) 6% 0.06 (0.01, 0.29) p<0.001
 Endocrine 93 (26%) 58% Reference
1

: p-value from Fisher’s exact test

2

: p-value from multivariable model accounting for correlation within clinician