Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 27;113(28):7846–7851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608649113

Table S1.

Summary of VDJH joins analysis from HTGTS-Rep-seq libraries of C57BL/6 mice

Cell type Locus Input DNA Coding end primer Exp.* No. of V(D)J junctions, including duplicates Correlation between % productive V(D)J subsets No. of unique CDR3 junctions Correlation between % productive V(D)J subsets
Pro-B IgH 2 μg JH4 Mouse 1 8,299 vs. M2: 0.88 1,639 vs. total: 0.97
Mouse 2 25,957 vs. M3: 0.98 9,133 vs. total: 0.99
Mouse 3 22,613 vs. M1: 0.85 8,894 vs. total: 0.99
Splenic B IgH 2 μg JH4 Mouse 1 45,857 vs. M2: 0.99 20,583 vs. total: 0.97
Mouse 2 57,477 vs. M3: 0.97 38,091 vs. total: 0.99
Mouse 3 16,504 vs. M1: 0.96 7,053 vs. total: 0.97
Splenic B IgH 2 μg JH1 Mouse 1 54,172 vs. M2: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 2 77,670 vs. M3: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 3 37,648 vs. M1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Splenic B IgH 2 μg JH2 Mouse 1 66,589 vs. M2: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 2 81,547 vs. M3: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 3 74,857 vs. M1: 0.99 N.D. N.D.
Splenic B IgH 2 μg JH3 Mouse 1 26,586 vs. M2: 0.99 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 2 29,619 vs. M3: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 3 23,097 vs. M1: 0.99 N.D. N.D.
Splenic B IgH 2 μg JH4 Mouse 1 21,532 vs. M2: 0.97 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 2 26,838 vs. M3: 0.95 N.D. N.D.
Mouse 3 12,669 vs. M1: 0.95 N.D. N.D.
Splenic B IgH 2 μg JH4 Repeat 1 20,703 vs. R2: 0.99 14,461 vs. total: 1.00
Repeat 2 18,959 vs. R3: 0.99 13,045 vs. total: 1.00
Repeat 3 22,118 vs. R1: 0.99 14,799 vs. total: 1.00
Splenic B IgH 500 ng JH4 Repeat 1 20,605 vs. R2: 0.98 5,093 vs. total: 0.99
Repeat 2 18,897 vs. R3: 0.97 5,374 vs. total: 0.99
Repeat 3 20,105 vs. R1: 0.97 5,570 vs. total: 0.99
Splenic B IgH 100 ng JH4 Repeat 1 12,007 vs. R2: 0.77 1,163 vs. total: 0.96
Repeat 2 6,968 vs. R3: 0.79 649 vs. total: 0.92
Repeat 3 8,106 vs. R1: 0.86 896 vs. total: 0.96
Splenic B Igκ 1 μg Jκ1 Mouse 1 46,554 vs. C1: 0.99 N.D. N.D.
Jκ2 Mouse 1 26,117 vs. C1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Jκ4 Mouse 1 16,047 vs. C1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Jκ5 Mouse 1 9,782 vs. C1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Splenic B Igκ 1 μg Jκ1 Combined 10,988 vs. M1: 0.99 N.D. N.D.
Jκ2 Combined 10,159 vs. M1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Jκ4 Combined 8,613 vs. M1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.
Jκ5 Combined 17,750 vs. M1: 0.98 N.D. N.D.

N.D., not determined.

*

Mouse 1, 2, 3, the experiments were performed from three different mice; Repeat 1, 2, 3, the experiments were performed using DNA from the same mouse.

The correlation coefficient values (r) were derived from two sets of productive V(D)J exons (%) via the CORREL function in Excel. The bigger the value, the more similar the two sets of data.