Skip to main content
. 2016 May 1;10(5):ZC112–ZC116. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16851.7840

[Table/Fig-6]:

Comparison of dimensional accuracy of group I casts (molar site) with master model using three types of impression trays.

Group I Group II Molar
Bucco-lingual Mesio-distal
Mean ± SD Difference Mean ± SD Difference
Group I
Medium body
IA
Metal Dual Arch
Mean ± SD
% difference
p value
6.847±
0.078
-
-
0.040±
0.078
0.6%
0.14, NS
8.741±
0.06
-
-
-0.002±
0.06
0.02%
0.92, NS
IB
Plastic Dual Arch
Mean ± SD
% difference
p value
6.881±
0.074
-
-
0.076±
0.074
1.1%
0.01, S
8.708±
0.033
-
-
0.031±
0.003
0.4%
0.02, S
IC
Custom Tray
Mean ± SD
% difference
p value
6.864±
0.033
-
-
0.023±
0.033
0.4%
0.05,S
8.730±
0.012
-
-
0.009±
0.012
0.1%
0.03,S
ANOVA
F
P
IA/IB/IC - 1.72
0.20,NS
- 1.80
0.19,S
(Difference In Accuracy Amongst Various Tray Groups) IA-IB
IA-IC
IB-IC
-
-
-
0.43,NS
0.84,NS
0.18,NS
-
-
-
0.17,S
0.80,NS
<0.01,S

*Anova test