Skip to main content
. 2016 May 1;10(5):ZC112–ZC116. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16851.7840

[Table/Fig-7]:

Comparison of dimensional accuracy of group II casts (premolar site) with master model using three types of impression trays.

Group I Group II Premolar
Bucco-lingual Mesio-distal
Mean ± SD Difference Mean ± SD Difference
Group II
Heavy +Light Body
IIA
Metal Dual Arch
Mean ± SD
% difference
P value
4.196±
0.010
-
-
0.008±
0.010
0.2%
0.04, S
3.254±
0.019
-
-
0.013±
0.019
0.4%
0.06, NS
IIB
Plastic Dual Arch
Mean ± SD
% difference
P value
4.170±
0.047
-
-
0.034±
0.047
0.8%
0.05, S
3.209±
0.072
-
-
0.058±
0.072
1.8%
0.03, S
IIC
Custom Tray
Mean ± SD
% difference
P value
4.196±
0.010
-
-
0.007±
0.010
0.2%
0.06,NS
3.257±
0.026
-
-
0.010±
0.026
0.3%
0.25,NS
ANOVA
F
P
IIA/IIB/IIC - 2.82
0.08,NS
- 3.47
0.04,S
(Difference In Accuracy Amongst Various Tray Groups) IIA-IIB
IIA-IIC
IIB-IIC
-
-
-
0.12,NS
1.0,NS
0.11,NS
-
-
-
0.09,S
0.99,NS
0.05,S

*Anova test