[Table/Fig-7]:
Comparison of dimensional accuracy of group II casts (premolar site) with master model using three types of impression trays.
Group I | Group II | Premolar | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bucco-lingual | Mesio-distal | |||||
Mean ± SD | Difference | Mean ± SD | Difference | |||
Group II Heavy +Light Body |
IIA Metal Dual Arch |
Mean ± SD % difference P value |
4.196± 0.010 - - |
0.008± 0.010 0.2% 0.04, S |
3.254± 0.019 - - |
0.013± 0.019 0.4% 0.06, NS |
IIB Plastic Dual Arch |
Mean ± SD % difference P value |
4.170± 0.047 - - |
0.034± 0.047 0.8% 0.05, S |
3.209± 0.072 - - |
0.058± 0.072 1.8% 0.03, S |
|
IIC Custom Tray |
Mean ± SD % difference P value |
4.196± 0.010 - - |
0.007± 0.010 0.2% 0.06,NS |
3.257± 0.026 - - |
0.010± 0.026 0.3% 0.25,NS |
|
ANOVA F P |
IIA/IIB/IIC | - | 2.82 0.08,NS |
- | 3.47 0.04,S |
|
(Difference In Accuracy Amongst Various Tray Groups) | IIA-IIB IIA-IIC IIB-IIC |
- - - |
0.12,NS 1.0,NS 0.11,NS |
- - - |
0.09,S 0.99,NS 0.05,S |
*Anova test