Skip to main content
. 2016 May 1;10(5):ZC43–ZC51. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19048.7756

[Table/Fig-11]:

Number and percentage of subjects with enamel opacities or hypoplasia by condition and by number of teeth affected.

Location and Age Normal Demarcated Opacity Diffuse Opacity Hypolpasia Not Recorded
No % No % No % No % No %
U 5 yrs 21 19.4 23 21.3 03 2.7 03 2.7 58 53.7
R 12 yrs 48 44.4 22 20.4 12 11.1 23 21.3 3 2.7
B 15 yrs 32 29.6 30 27.8 15 13.9 25 23.2 6 5.55
A 35-44 yrs 62 57.4 22 20.4 19 17.6 2 1.9 3 2.7
N 65-74 yrs 51 47.2 23 21.3 18 16.6 16 14.9 0 0
Total 214 39.6 120 22.2 67 12.4 69 12.7 70 12.9
R 5 yrs 15 27.7 11 20.4 4 7.4 1 1.9 23 42.6
U 12 yrs 18 33.3 18 33.3 9 16.6 8 14.9 1 1.9
R 15 yrs 31 57.4 11 20.4 6 11.1 5 9.3 1 1.9
A 35-44 yrs 19 35.2 7 12.9 22 40.7 6 11.1 0 0
L 65-74 yrs 20 37 17 31.5 13 24 2 3.7 2 3.7
Total 103 38.1 64 23.7 54 20 22 8.15 27 10
Grand Total 317 39.1 184 22.7 121 14.9 91 11.2 97 11.93
Chi Square Test is used, p value comes out to be -
Comparison of enamel opacities or hypoplasia in rural and urban subjects.
Demarcated Opacity 1.2
Diffuse Opacity 0.02*
Hypolpasia 0.32

* Statistically significant (p<0.05)