Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 15;4(1):24–27. doi: 10.1159/000445354

Table 1.

Results of individual participant data meta-analysis [10]

Models Carotid DC (per 1 lower SD) as the determinant and incident stroke as the outcome1
Cox regression analysis Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)
 Model 12 1.24 (1.05; 1.47)
 Model 12 + cfPWV 1.24 (1.05; 1.46)

Risk improvement analysis3 Effect estimate (95% confidence interval)
 IDI, % point 0.4 (0.1; 0.6)
 Continuous NRI, % 18.6 (5.8; 31.3)

Association between carotid stiffness and incident stroke: additional adjustments for cfPWV and analysis of risk improvement. The model was extended by the carotid distensibility coefficient (DC). SD = Standard deviation; IDI = integrated discrimination improvement; NRI = net reclassification index.

1

Number of participants for this analysis: n = 4,075, with 351 events and 47,881 person-years of follow-up.

2

Model 1: results adjusted for age, sex, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, body mass index, smoking habits, diabetes, triglycerides, total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, prior cardiovascular disease, and the use of lipid-modifying and antihypertensive medication.

3

The baseline model for risk improvement analysis included the Framingham stroke risk score factors and cfPWV.