Table 1.
Results of individual participant data meta-analysis [10]
Models | Carotid DC (per 1 lower SD) as the determinant and incident stroke as the outcome1 |
---|---|
Cox regression analysis | Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) |
Model 12 | 1.24 (1.05; 1.47) |
Model 12 + cfPWV | 1.24 (1.05; 1.46) |
Risk improvement analysis3 | Effect estimate (95% confidence interval) |
IDI, % point | 0.4 (0.1; 0.6) |
Continuous NRI, % | 18.6 (5.8; 31.3) |
Association between carotid stiffness and incident stroke: additional adjustments for cfPWV and analysis of risk improvement. The model was extended by the carotid distensibility coefficient (DC). SD = Standard deviation; IDI = integrated discrimination improvement; NRI = net reclassification index.
Number of participants for this analysis: n = 4,075, with 351 events and 47,881 person-years of follow-up.
Model 1: results adjusted for age, sex, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, body mass index, smoking habits, diabetes, triglycerides, total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, prior cardiovascular disease, and the use of lipid-modifying and antihypertensive medication.
The baseline model for risk improvement analysis included the Framingham stroke risk score factors and cfPWV.