Table 1.
Various studies showing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices followed by arthroscopic surgeons worldwide.
| Sr. No. | Authors | Country | Year of publication | No. of respondents | Choice of grafts (in per cent) |
Choice of femoral fixation device (in per cent) |
Femoral portal preparation (in per cent) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS | BPTB | Other | Endobutton | Screw | Cross pin | AM | TT | |||||
| 1. | Sandhu et al. | India | 2008 | 24 (57.14%) | 40.7 | 35.6 | 18.7 | 10.73 | 75.5 | <12.75 | NA | NA |
| 2. | Duquin et al. | USA | 2009 | 993 (57%) | 32 | 46 | 22 | NA | NA | |||
| 3. | Mc Rae et al. | Canada | 2011 | 283 (49%) | 73 | 29.9 | 7.3 | 51.5 | 36 | 12.5 | 27.9 | 69.6 |
| 4. | Mahnik et al. | Croatia | 2013 | 39 (75%) | 95 | 05 | 0 | 62 | 05 | 33 | 67 | 33 |
| 5. | Chechik et al. | 57 different | 2013 | 261 | 63 | 26 | 11 | 40 | 46 | 10 | 68 | 31 |
| 6. | Vaishya et al. | India (Delhi) | 2015 | 46 (80%) | 83.3 | 14.6 | 2.1 | 93.75 | 4.2 | 89.6 | 10.4 | |