Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;57(2):161–170. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12447

Table 1.

Sample characteristics

ASD Non‐ASD
Cotwins Cotwins + Low‐risk
N 112 101 164
Child gender, % male 83.0 52.5a 61.0a
Maternal ethnicity, % white 96.4 96.0 96.3
Maternal education, % with A‐level or above 50.4 52.0 52.1
Child age in years, M (SD) 10.04 (1.58) 9.93 (1.37) 11.60 (2.45)a
M (SD) 95% CI M (SD) 95% CI M (SD) 95% CI
DAWBA ASD total impairment 30.65 (10.77) 28.64–32.67 9.02 (10.30)a 6.99–11.05 8.53 (8.48)a 7.22–9.84
SAS score 9.23 (6.54) 8.00–10.46 22.15 (7.79)a 20.60–23.70 22.70 (6.92)a 21.63–23.77
ADI‐R algorithm total 39.18 (12.77) 36.79–41.57 10.59 (10.48)a 8.53–12.66
ADOS scoreb 6.61 (2.45) 6.15–7.07 2.31 (1.85)a 1.94–2.67

Non‐ASD (cotwins): unaffected cotwins of those with ASD; comparison group with ADI‐R/ADOS data. Non‐ASD (cotwins and low‐risk): unaffected cotwins and low‐risk twins (CAST score<12); comparison group with best‐estimate research diagnosis data.

a

p < .001 comparing the ASD group with each non‐ASD group.

b

ADOS comparison scores are calibrated to allow comparison across different modules and ages (Gotham, Pickles, & Lord, 2009).