Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;21(5):466–472. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.06.002

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate comparison of visual complications.

Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Risk variables Visual complication
P-value ORd 95%CIe P-value
Yes
No
n % n %
Sex
 Male 2 3.5 55 96.5 0.37 0.53 0.07–3.80 0.53
 Female 3 8.1 34 91.9
Age
 (Mean ± SD) 41.6 ± 4.6 41.7 ± 11.4 0.98 1.01 0.92–1.09 0.93
Technique
 SRTb 1 1.6 62 98.4 1.00
 3DCRTc 0 0 5 100 0.027f
 Conventional 4 15.4 22 84.6 10.36 1.07–99.3 0.04
RTa dose (cGy)
 4500–5040 0 0 13 100
 5041–5400 2 4.9 39 95.1 0.57
 >5400 3 7.5 37 92.5
Dose per fraction (cGy)
 180 0 0 19 100
 180–200 5 7.2 64 92.8 0.38
 >200 0 0 6 100
No. of prior surgeries
 0 0 0 6 100
 1 4 5.6 67 94.4 0.91
 2 1 6.7 14 93.3
 3 0 0 2 100
Hypopituitarism prior to RTa
 Present 4 7.3 51 92.7
 Absent 1 2.6 37 97.4 0.33
Previous RTa
 Yes 0 0 3 100 0.68
 No 5 5.5 86 94.5
a

Radiotherapy (RT).

b

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

c

3 dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).

d

Odds ratio.

e

Confidence interval.

f

Not included in multivariate analysis as events were zero.