Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;12(2):1493–1500. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4765

Table IV.

Multivariate analysisa of OS and DMFS.

OS DMFS


Parameter HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Model 1-SUVmax
  SUVmax (≥28.5/<28.5) 3.94 1.13–12.71 <0.04 2.00 0.42–7.35 0.34
  T category (T4/T1-3) 5.10 1.20–20.52 <0.03 2.40 0.55–9.91 0.24
  Treatment group (surgery/RT) 0.62 0.14–2.43 0.50 1.50 0.37–5.72 0.56
Model 2-SUVpeak
  SUVpeak (≥19/<19) 2.73 0.83–8.00 0.09 1.49 0.33–5.04 0.57
  T category (T4/T1-3) 4.18 0.97–16.40 0.09 2.19 0.49–9.00 0.29
  Treatment group (surgery/RT) 0.52 0.12–2.02 0.35 1.38 0.34–5.20 0.64
Model 3-MTV
  MTV (≥12/<12) 3.29 0.48–29.91 0.22 2.68 0.36–27.14 0.34
  T category (T4/T1-3) 3.04 0.51–12.86 0.20 1.38 0.15–7.71 0.75
  Treatment group (surgery/RT) 0.37 0.05–1.60 0.20 1.15 0.23–4.58 0.85
Model 4-TLG
  TLG (≥42/<42) 4.00 1.11–18.74 <0.04 6.61 1.59–44.67 <0.01
  T category (T4/T1-3) 2.16 0.51–8.54 0.28 1.04 0.23–4.46 0.64
  Treatment group (surgery/RT) 0.59 0.15–2.14 0.43 1.57 0.39–5.84 0.51
a

Cox proportional hazard model. OS, overall survival; DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SUV, standardized uptake value; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; RT, radiotherapy.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure