Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;17:295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1138-0

Table 4.

Shoulder function outcome measure scores at recruitment and 6 week follow up (values are mean (SD))

Recruitment (n = 92) 6 week follow up (n = 81) difference in pointsa Effect size (Cohen’s d) Paired t-test
SFInX v1.0 (0–100) 62.1 (23.4) 71.9 (18.9) 10.3 (14.0) 0.44 t(df) = 6.62(80), p < 0.001
DASH (0–100)b 71.6 (21.1) 77.3 (19.1) 6.8 (11.9) 0.31 t(df) = 5.10(80), p < 0.001
Constant (0–100) 52.2 (20.2) 60.4 (18.3) 9.0 (10.4) 0.44 t(df) = 7.81(80), p < 0.001

aData from n=81 of whom data from two assessments were available, was used to calculate the difference in points and effect sizes, and used to perform the paired t-test

SFInX v1.0, Shoulder Function IndeX version 1.0

DASH, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (bscores have been reversed to facilitate comparison of total scores; 100 points indicates “no disability”)

Constant, Constant Score