Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;12(2):1301–1314. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4783

Table VIII.

Percentages of intervention in included studies.

MS rank MS mOS mOS-ITC Author, year ITC (%) TKI (%) SCT (%) WBRT (%) SC (%) Ref.
  1 3.0 mo 3.0 mo Gwak et al, 2013 100.0 27.6c 22.9c 28.6c (23)
  2 3.0 mo 18.0 moa Morris et al, 2012     6.0 14.0 16.0 45.0 30.0 (10)
  3 14 wks 17 wks Lee et al, 2013   73.2 16.1 16.8 43.7 13.4 (1)
  4 3.6 mo Umemura et al, 2012   29.7 56.0 29.9 23.1 25.3 (12)
  5 4.3 mo Park et al, 2012   96.0 28.0 24.0 42.2c (24)
  6 5.0 mo 5.0 mo Chamberlain et al, 1998 100.0   0.0 37.5c 28.1d   0.0 (7)
  7 6.0 mo 6.0 mo Present study 100.0   0.0 24.0c 18.0d   0.0
  8 7.0 mo 7.0 mo Nakagawa et al, 1999b 100.0   0.0   0.0e   0.0e   0.0 (21)
  9 7.5 mo 7.5 mo Present studyc 100.0   0.0   0.0e   0.0e   0.0
10 8.0 mo 8.0 mo Nakagawa et al, 1996b 100.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0 (22)
a

Only 6 patients received ITC

b

Also calculated in the present study

c

concurrent with ITC

d

prior to ITC

e

Some patients in this study received WBRT or SCT prior to ITC, but the start point for calculating survival is the onset of ITC. MS, median survival; mOS, MS of all the patients; mOS-ITC, MS related to ITC; ITC, intrathecal chemotherapy; SCT, systemic chemotherapy; WBRT, whole-brain radiotherapy; SC, support care; Ref., reference; mo, months; wks, weeks; -, unavailable.