Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Act Health. 2008 Jan;5(1):117–131. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.1.117

Table 4.

Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) for the Combined Associations of Perceived and Objectively Measured Crime for the 1-Mile Buffer Surrounding Each Respondent’s Home Address (n = 303)

Leisure-time physical activitya Outdoor leisure-time physical
activityb
Walking activityc Transporta-
tion activity




Weighted
prevalence
(n)
Meets recom-
mendation vs.
inactive
Insufficient vs.
inactive
Meets recom-
mendation vs.
inactive
Insufficient
vs. inactive
Meets recom-
mendation
vs. inactive
Insufficient
vs. inactive
Any activity
vs. no activity
Model Set 7d: Total
 crimee
  objectively mea-
    sured total crime
      low 47.4 (152) 2.8 (1.2–6.5) f 1.2 (0.5–2.5) 2.8 (1.1–7.0) 1.2 (0.6–2.3) 1.1 (0.5–2.4) 1.1 (0.6–2.2) 1.2 (0.6–2.1)
      high 52.6 (151) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  crime of fear for
    personal safety is
    a barrier
      yes 13.5 (45) 0.7 (0.2–1.8) 1.1 (0.4–2.7) 0.6 (0.2–1.8) 1.4 (0.6–3.4) 1.2 (0.4–3.5) 1.0 (0.4–2.7) 0.8 (0.4–1.8)
      no 86.5 (256) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Model Set 8d:
Criminal offenses
  objectively mea-
    sured criminal
   offenses
      low 47.1 (152) 4.0 (1.6–10.01) f 1.5 (0.6–10.0) 5.0 (1.8–13.6) f 1.7 (0.8–3.7) 0.9 (0.4–1.8) 1.0 (0.5–2.0) 0.9 (0.5–1.7)
      high 52.9 (151) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
crime or fear for
    personal safety is
    a barrier
      yes 13.5 (45) 0.7 (0.3–1.9) 1.0 (0.4–2.7) 0.6 (0.2–1.8) 1.4 (0.6–3.7) 1.3 (0.5–3.8) 0.9 (0.4–3.8) 0.9 (0.4–1.9)
      no 86.5 (256) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
a

Adjusted for household income, body mass index, and census-level income.

b

Adjusted for household income, number of children in household, availability of motor vehicle, and census-level income.

c

Adjusted for work activity.

d

All models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity and gender.

e

Total crime is the sum of criminal offenses, incivilities and traffic offenses.

f

P < .05; confidence limits of 1.0 might be the result of truncation.